The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature of Selection on the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Abstract
Only natural selection can account for the extreme genetic diversity of genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Although the structure and function of classic MHC genes is well understood at the molecular and cellular levels, there is controversy about how MHC diversity is selectively maintained. The diversifying selection can be driven by pathogen interactions and inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. Pathogen-driven selection can maintain MHC polymorphism based on heterozygote advantage or frequency-dependent selection due to pathogen evasion of MHC-dependent immune recognition. Empirical evidence demonstrates that specific MHC haplotypes are resistant to certain infectious agents, while susceptible to others. These data are consistent with both heterozygote advantage and frequency-dependent models. Additional research is needed to discriminate between these mechanisms. Infectious agents can precipitate autoimmunity and can potentially contribute to MHC diversity through molecular mimicry and by favoring immunodominance. MHC-dependent abortion and mate choice, based on olfaction, can also maintain MHC diversity and probably functions both to avoid genome-wide inbreeding and produce MHC-heterozygous offspring with increased immune responsiveness. Although this diverse set of hypotheses are often treated as competing alternatives, we believe that they all fit into a coherent, internally consistent thesis. It is likely that at least in some species, all of these mechanisms operate, leading to the extreme diversification found in MHC genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation
Sommer, S. (2005) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-16 · Cited by 913
The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): A review
Lawrence, C. (2007) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.077 · Cited by 715
An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction
Stevenson, R. J. (2010) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp083 · Cited by 689
MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections
Penn, D. J., Damjanovich, K., & Potts, W. K. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162006499 · Cited by 668
Self-citationThe Scent of Genetic Compatibility: Sexual Selection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Penn, D. J. (2002) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Apanius, V., Penn, D., Slev, P. R., Ruff, L. R., & Potts, W. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-224
- ISSN
- 0197-3355 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-6472
- OpenAlex
- W2028216089
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Selection on the Major Histocompatibility Complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/critrevimmunol.v17.i2.40
- The paper
- Apanius, V., Penn, D., Slev, P. R., Ruff, L. R., & Potts, W. K. (1997). The Nature of Selection on the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Critical Reviews™ in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevimmunol.v17.i2.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.