The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia System in Primates
Abstract
The primate basal ganglia receives information from most of the cerebrum, including the frontal cortex, but projects (via the dorsal thalamus) primarily to the frontal lobe, perhaps in its entirety. As such, the frontal cortex and basal ganglia constitute an integrated, distributed neuronal architecture. We review evidence that the frontal lobe and basal ganglia specialize in different, but related, aspects of response learning. Frontal cortex acts when new rules need to be learned and older ones rejected, whereas the basal ganglia potentiate previously learned rules based on environmental context and reinforcement history. Such potentiation increases the probability that the central nervous system will select a particular rule to guide behavior. We outline a possible mechanism for the basal ganglia's proposed role in rule potentiation, one that involves both the direct and indirect striatal output pathways and their dopaminergic input. It has previously been proposed that direct-pathway neurons recognize a pattern of corticostriatal inputs, which promotes activity in recurrent, positive-feedback modules (or loops) of which they are an integral part. We propose that this recurrent activity potentiates a rule associated with those modules. If so, then the dopaminergic system is well situated and organized to modulate rule potentiation in both the short and long term. Dopaminergic neurons of the midbrain increase activity during learning and other periods of relatively unpredictable reinforcement. Dopamine enhances gene expression and other forms of activity in striatal neurons of the direct pathway, while suppressing neurons of the indirect pathway. In the short term, then, dopamine may augment the activity of modules triggered by a recognized context, whereas in the long term it may promote context-dependent activation of the same modules. Together, these modulatory influences could support both rule potentiation and learning the context for potentiating that rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Rice, D., & Barone, S. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s3511 · Cited by 2,944
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
The prefontral cortex and cognitive control
Miller, E. K. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35036228 · Cited by 2,016
Metadata
- Authors
- Wise, S. P., Murray, E. A., & Gerfen, C. R.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 317-356
- ISSN
- 0892-0915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069310569
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia System in Primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v10.i3-4.30
- The paper
- Wise, S. P., Murray, E. A., & Gerfen, C. R. (1996). The Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia System in Primates. Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v10.i3-4.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.