The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species Diversity and Utilization of Medicinal Mushrooms and Fungi in China (Review)
Abstract
The investigation and utilization of medicinal fungi in China has received considerable attention in recent years. However, information on medicinal fungi is scattered throughout the literature, and many nomenclatural inconsistencies have been found in the Chinese reports. The publications on Chinese medicinal fungi have been critically checked; as a result, 540 medicinal mushrooms and fungi from China were enumerated in the present checklist. All names have been checked or revised in accordance with contemporary taxonomy and the latest version of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code). The "out-of-date" names, illegitimate names, nonexistent names, and misapplied names in previous reports were revised. The common synonyms are listed after their valid names. The main medicinal functions of each species, together with the original or important references, are provided. The 540 species belonging to 10 classes, 26 orders, 76 families, and 199 genera of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota have been recorded with medicinal values. Most are the higher Basidiomycetes (482 species), which comprise approximately 89% of all the Chinese medicinal species. In total, 126 medicinal functions are thought to be provided by Chinese medicinal fungi, and 331 (61% of the total medicinal fungi) can be used as antitumor agents. Other common functions are hemostasis, antibacterial, improving immunity, detoxication, and anti-inflammatory. Fifteen species, including Ganoderma lucidum, are the most important or commonly used medicinal fungi, and 26 species, including Agaricus bisporus, are commonly cultivated in China as food or for medicinal products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationResource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: edible, medicinal and poisonous species
Wu, F., Zhou, L.-W., Yang, Z.-L., Bau, T., Li, T.-H., & Dai, Y.-C. (2019) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-019-00432-7 · Cited by 394
Self-citationAlves, C. T., Ferreira, I. C., Barros, L., Silva, S., Azeredo, J., & Henriques, M. (2014) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.13.147 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, Y.-C., Yang, Z.-L., Cui, B.-K., Yu, C.-J., & Zhou, L.-W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-302
- ISSN
- 1521-9437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974870448
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species Diversity and Utilization of Medicinal Mushrooms and Fungi in China (Review). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/intjmedmushr.v11.i3.80
- The paper
- Dai, Y.-C., Yang, Z.-L., Cui, B.-K., Yu, C.-J., & Zhou, L.-W. (2009). Species Diversity and Utilization of Medicinal Mushrooms and Fungi in China (Review). International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. https://doi.org/10.1615/intjmedmushr.v11.i3.80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.