Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LIMITATIONS OF PHYSICS INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR NONLINEAR TWO-PHASE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA

Open access
Fuks, Olga, Tchelepi, Hamdi A.·2020·Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing

Abstract

Deep learning techniques have recently been applied to a wide range of computational physics problems.In this paper, we focus on developing a physics-based approach that enables the neural network to learn the solution of a dynamic fluid-flow problem governed by a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE).The main idea of physics informed machine learning (PIML) approaches is to encode the underlying physical law (i.e., the PDE) into the neural network as prior information.We investigate the applicability of the PIML approach to the forward problem of immiscible two-phase fluid transport in porous media, which is governed by a nonlinear first-order hyperbolic PDE subject to initial and boundary data.We employ the PIML strategy to solve this forward problem without any additional labeled data in the interior of the domain.Particularly, we are interested in nonconvex flux functions in the PDE, where the solution involves shocks and mixed waves (shocks and rarefactions).We have found that such a PIML approach fails to provide reasonable approximations to the solution in the presence of shocks in the saturation field.We investigated several architectures and experimented with a large number of neural-network parameters, and the overall finding is that PIML strategies that employ the nonlinear hyperbolic conservation equation in the loss function are inadequate.However, we have found that employing a parabolic form of the conservation equation, whereby a small amount of diffusion is added, the neural network is consistently able to learn accurate approximation of the solutions containing shocks and mixed waves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/jmachlearnmodelcomput.2020033905

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Metadata

Authors
Fuks, O., & Tchelepi, H. A.
Venue
Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
Publisher
Begell House
Published
2020
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
19-37
ISSN
2689-3967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047245470
Cited by
303
References
25
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LIMITATIONS OF PHYSICS INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR NONLINEAR TWO-PHASE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/jmachlearnmodelcomput.2020033905
The paper
Fuks, O., & Tchelepi, H. A. (2020). LIMITATIONS OF PHYSICS INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR NONLINEAR TWO-PHASE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA. Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1615/jmachlearnmodelcomput.2020033905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.