CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Biblical Studies and InterpretationStudy and Philosophy of ReligionKarl Barth and Christian Theology

Zweifel

Open access
Schliesser, Benjamin·2023·Mohr Siebeck eBooks
DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-161928-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Doubt is a symbol of modernity, but it is still sidelined in biblical studies. In this study, Benjamin Schliesser presents for the first time a synopsis of the early Christian discussion of doubt in the context of the ancient religious and intellectual history. It reveals a surprisingly multifaceted discourse, which will also stimulate present-day theological reflection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1628/978-3-16-161928-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Related

Authors
Schliesser, B.
Corresponding author
Schliesser, Benjamin
ORCID
Schliesser, Benjamin
Venue
Mohr Siebeck eBooks
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Published
2023
DOI
10.1628/978-3-16-161928-1
OpenAlex
W4312967305
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
book
Language
de
Open access
Licence
Locations
Mohr Siebeck eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
doubt, early Christianity, biblical studies, modernity, religious thought

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review