Cited by 2Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationLibrary Science and Informationscientometrics and bibliometrics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How international readers view Chinese academic journals: a survey of Chinese-speaking scholars in the UK

Open access
Li, Ruoxi, Rowland, Fytton, Meadows, Jack·2008·Serials The Journal for the Serials Community

Abstract

To find out how international users gain access to and use Chinese- language academic journals, 37 Chinese mother-tongue scholars in the UK were interviewed. The results show that their usage of journals published in China in the Chinese language, although quite varied based on their disciplines, is limited, except for a few scholars from engineering and applied technology.The reasons why more than 70% of the respondents do not look up and use Chinese journals, although they say that they pay close attention to China’s research progress, are complicated. These reasons, as illustrated by the research, are examined in detail, and issues of quality, access, language and preconception are among the aspects discussed.The results show that the most pressing matters of the moment are to improve accessibility and to minimize the language barriers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1629/2135

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Dai, W, An analysis of international influence of the Chinese academic periodicals [in Chinese]. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2004, (1), 111-118.
  2. Wei, L J, Pay attention on 'er' pronunciation in Chinese mandarin language level test [in Chinese]. Journal of Chinese, 2006(12), 146-147.
  3. Wang, Z W, Analysis on building of mandarin course in higher education [in Chinese]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 3(11), 168-169.
  4. Zhou, X M, Human Communication [in Chinese]. Shanghai, Shanghai Arts Press, 1990.
  5. Rowlands, I and Nicholas, D, New Journal Publishing Models -An International Survey of Senior Researchers. A CIBER Report for the Association of STM Publishers. London, University College London, 2005.
  6. Li, R X, Huang, Y, Ou, H , You, Z S and Rowland, F, A review of practice and research progress of Open Access in international scholarly publishing [in Chinese]. Acta Editologica, 2006, 18(3),237-240.
  7. Zou, C L, To develop science needs scientists learn thoroughly the 'globalization' language -English [in Chinese]. Impact of Science on Society, 2005(2), 54-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Li, R., Rowland, F., & Meadows, J.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing Normal University (CN)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Venue
Serials The Journal for the Serials Community
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
35-44
ISSN
0953-0460 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018283636
Cited by
2
References
6
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Serials The Journal for the Serials Community (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
journal usage, language barriers, journal accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How international readers view Chinese academic journals: a survey of Chinese-speaking scholars in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1629/2135
The paper
Li, R., Rowland, F., & Meadows, J. (2008). How international readers view Chinese academic journals: a survey of Chinese-speaking scholars in the UK. Serials The Journal for the Serials Community. https://doi.org/10.1629/2135