Cited by 473Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational and Text Analysis MethodsTopic Modeling

Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning

Open access
Kim, Edward, Huang, Kevin, Saunders, Adam, McCallum, Andrew, Ceder, Gerbrand, Olivetti, Elsa·2017·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

In the past several years, Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) efforts have produced myriad examples of computationally designed materials in the fields of energy storage, catalysis, thermoelectrics, and hydrogen storage as well as large data resources that are used to screen for potentially transformative compounds. The bottleneck in high-throughput materials design has thus shifted to materials synthesis, which motivates our development of a methodology to automatically compile materials synthesis parameters across tens of thousands of scholarly publications using natural language processing techniques. To demonstrate our framework’s capabilities, we examine the synthesis conditions for various metal oxides across more than 12 thousand manuscripts. We then apply machine learning methods to predict the critical parameters needed to synthesize titania nanotubes via hydrothermal methods and verify this result against known mechanisms. Finally, we demonstrate the capacity for transfer learning by using machine learning models to predict synthesis outcomes on materials systems not included in the training set and thereby outperform heuristic strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental data sets extracted from the literature, there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments, leading to challenges in classification tasks.

    “For example, in experimental data sets extracted from the literature (14,15,19), there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments (16, 107, 108), leading to challenges in classification tasks (17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1439-1449.
  2. Mikolov, T.; Corrado, G.; Chen, K.; Dean, J. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR 2013) 2013, 1-12.
  3. Abadi, M.; Barham, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; Ghemawat, S.; Irving, G.; Isard, M.; Kudlur, M.; Levenberg, J.; Monga, R.; Moore, S.; Murray, D. G.; Steiner, B.; Tucker, P.; Vasudevan, V.; Warden, P.; Wicke, M.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Brain, G. TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '16); 2016; pp 265-284.
  4. Ammundsen, B.; Paulsen, J. Novel Lithium-Ion Cathode Materials Based on Layered Manganese Oxides. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 943-956.
  5. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotubes: Synthesis and Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2904-2939.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, E., Huang, K., Saunders, A., McCallum, A., Ceder, G., & Olivetti, E.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Olivetti, Elsa
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
29
Issue
21
Pages
9436-9444
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2766362701
Cited by
473
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 16
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (EDCBEE)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT Energy Initiative)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (N00014-16-1-2432)
  • Government of Canada
  • National Science Foundation (1534340)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
materials synthesis, Materials Genome Initiative, natural language processing, metal oxides, TiO2 nanotubes, hydrothermal synthesis, transfer learning, high-throughput materials design, computational materials design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review