The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colorectal cancer, one entity or three
Open accessAbstract
Understanding of the mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis has been gaining momentum for some years on account of its high incidence and impact on the lives of individuals affected. Different genetic abnormalities have been found in colorectal cancers from different sites. For example, proximal colon cancer is usually related to the nucleotide instability pathway, as microsatellite instability (MSI). However, distal colon cancer is usually associated with specific chromosomal instability (CIN). The development of cancer at the rectum, though similar to that at the colon, displays its own unique features. These differences might be partially attributed to different embryological development and physiological circumstances. Environmental factors such as diet and alcohol intake also differ in their role in the development of tumors in the three segments, proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum. "Proximal shift" of colon cancer has been known for some time, and survival rates of colorectal cancer are higher when rectal cancers are excluded, both of which emphasize the three different segments of colorectal cancer and their different properties. Meanwhile, colonic and rectal cancers are distinctive therapeutic entities. The concept of three entities of colorectal cancer may be important in designing clinical trails or therapeutic strategies. However, the dispute about the inconsistency of data concerning the site-specific mechanism of colorectal carcinoma does exist, and more evidence about molecular events of carcinogenesis and targeted therapy needs to be collected to definitely confirm the conception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dietary Fiber Intake Reduces Risk for Colorectal Adenoma: A Meta-analysis
Ben, Q., Sun, Y., Chai, R., Qian, A., Xu, B., & Yuan, Y. (2014) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.003 · Cited by 156
Rampazzo, E., Bertorelle, R., Serra, L., Terrin, L., Candiotto, C., Pucciarelli, S., Bianco, P. D., Nitti, D., & De Rossi, A. (2010) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605644 · Cited by 125
“Rectal tumours are thought to arise through mechanisms similar to left-colon cancers; recently, it has been proposed that they constitute a third entity displaying specific characteristics (Li and Lai, 2009).”
BackgroundBerntsson, J., Eberhard, J., Nodin, B., Leandersson, K., Larsson, A. H., & Jirström, K. (2018) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2018.1465165 · Cited by 62
Araghi, M., Galanti, M. R., Lundberg, M., Liu, Z., Ye, W., Lager, A., Engström, G., Manjer, J., Alfredsson, L., Knutsson, A., et al. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494817714191 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, F.-Y., & Lai, M.-D.
- Venue
- Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
- Publisher
- Zhejiang University Press
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 1673-1581 (ISSN-L)
- 1862-1783
- OpenAlex
- W2029348349
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorectal cancer, one entity or three. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1631/jzus.b0820273
- The paper
- Li, F.-Y., & Lai, M.-D. (2009). Colorectal cancer, one entity or three. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b0820273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.