Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities

Wolfe, Cary·2009·PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America

Abstract

Trying to give an overview of the burgeoning area known as animal studies is, if you'll permit me the expression, a bit like herding cats. My recourse to that analogy is meant to suggest that “the animal,” when you think about it, is everywhere (including in the metaphors, similes, proverbs, and narratives we have relied on for centuries—millennia, even). Teach a course or write an article on the subject, and well-intentioned suggestions about interesting material pour in from all quarters. In my field alone, there's not just, say, the starring role of bear, deer, and dog at the heart of William Faulkner's Go Down, Moses and the futility of trying to imagine Ernest Hemingway without his fraternity of bulls, lions, and fish or Marianne Moore without her menagerie of pangolins and jellyfish. There's also King Kong, Babe, Charlotte's Web, Seabiscuit, The Silence of the Lambs, The Horse Whisperer, and The Fly.There's the art of Damien Hirst, Joseph Beuys, Sue Coe, William Wegman, Bill Viola, Carolee Schneeman, Lynn Randolph, and Patricia Piccinini. And all those bird poems, from Percy Shelley's skylark and John Keats's nightingale to Edgar Allan Poe's raven and Wallace Stevens's blackbird. As any medievalist or early modern scholar will tell you, the question of the animal assumes, if anything, even more centrality in earlier periods; indeed, recent and emerging scholarship suggests a picture in which the idea of the animal that we have inherited from the Enlightenment and thinkers such as Descartes and Kant is better seen as marking a brief period (if the formative one for our prevailing intellectual, political, and juridical institutions) bookended by a pre- and posthumanism that think the human/animal distinction quite otherwise. So there's also William Hogarth and Hieronymus Bosch,The Faerie Queene and Beowulf.And, of course, there is the central place of the animal in non-Western literature and culture, written and oral, which would require another essay altogether.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.564

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Steeves, 1999, Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology, and Animal Life
  2. Bruce, 2008, Posthuman Metamorphosis: Narrative and Systems
  3. Neil, 2007, Oxford Literary Review, 29.1
  4. Scapp, 1998, Eating Culture
  5. Jennifer, 2005, Civilized Creatures: Urban Animals, Sentimental Culture, and American Literature, 1850–1900
  6. Diana, 1996, Human, All Too Human
  7. Randy, 2003, Poetic Animals and Animal Souls
  8. Nash, 2006, Configurations, 14.1–2, 1, 10.1353/con.0.0000 · doi:10.1353/con.0.0000
  9. Andrew, 1995, Animal Theology
  10. Mary, 1983, Animals in American Literature
  11. Jacques, 1991, Who Comes after the Subject?, 96
  12. Erica, 2006, Brutal Reasoning: Animals, Rationality, and Humanity in Early Modern Thought
  13. Steve, 2001, The Postmodern Animal
  14. Collard, 1989, Rape of the Wild: Man's Violence against Animals and the Earth
  15. Tom, 2006, Parallax, 12.1, 1
  16. Bruce, 2002, Shakespeare among the Animals
  17. Laurie, Shannon . “Poor, Bare, Forked: Animal Sovereignty, Human Negative Exceptionalism, and the Natural History of King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly (2009): forthcoming. Print. · doi:10.1353/shq.0.0076
  18. Akira, 2000, Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife
  19. 2007, Mosaic, 40.1, 1
  20. Jonathan, 2003, Animals in Film
  21. Roger, 2002, The Difficulty of Being a Dog
  22. Cary, 2008, Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World
  23. Ellen, 2000, Form and Contentment, MLQ, 61.1, 17
  24. Arien, 1999, Humans and Other Animals
  25. Leonard, 2007, This Is Not Sufficient: An Essay on Animality and Human Nature in Derrida
  26. Stanley, 2008, Philosophy and Animal Life
  27. 10.7312/rohm14506 · doi:10.7312/rohm14506
  28. Erica, 2004, Renaissance Beasts: Of Animals, Humans, and Other Wonderful Creatures
  29. Cora, 1991, The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind
  30. Coetzee, 1999, The Lives of Animals
  31. 10.2307/j.ctvs89dhj · doi:10.2307/j.ctvs89dhj
  32. Margot, 1985, Beasts of the Modern Imagination: Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, Ernst, and Lawrence
  33. Kuzniar, 2006, Melancholia's Dog: Reflections on Our Animal Kinship
  34. Eduardo, 2005, Telepresence and Bio Art: Networking Humans, Rabbits, and Robots
  35. 2006, Mosaic, 39.4, 1
  36. Harriet, 1989, The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age
  37. Gary, 1995, Animals, Property, and the Law
  38. 2006, Killing Animals
  39. Kenyon-Jones, 2001, Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing
  40. Tom, 2009, Ciferae: 101 Wild Animals: A Bestiary for Today in Five Fingers
  41. Michel, 2007, The Parasite
  42. Eduardo, 2007, Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond
  43. Karl, 1978, The Marx-Engels Reader, 66
  44. James, 2004, Critical Disciplinarity, Critical Inquiry, 30.2
  45. Nigel, 2002, Representing Animals
  46. Erik, 2005, Meat Market: Animals, Ethics, and Money
  47. Peter, 1975, Animal Liberation

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Wolfe, C.
Venue
PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America
Published
2009-03
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
564-575
ISSN
  • 0030-8129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1530
OpenAlex
W2018215725
Cited by
254
References
53
FWCI
160.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.564
The paper
Wolfe, C. (2009). Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.564

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.