The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Case for Animal Rights
Open accessAbstract
I regard myself as an advocate of animal rights – as a Part of the animal rights movement. That movement, as I conceive it, is committed to a number of goals, including: the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Animism” Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology
Bird‐David, N. (1999) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/200061 · Cited by 1,078
From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare
Dawkins, M. S. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00077104 · Cited by 1,014
Current issues in fish welfare
Huntingford, F. A., Adams, C., Braithwaite, V. A., Kadri, S., Pottinger, T. G., Sandøe, P., & Turnbull, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.001046.x · Cited by 871
G EOENGINEERING THE C LIMATE: History and Prospect
Keith, D. W. (2000) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.245 · Cited by 567
Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Regan, T.
- Venue
- Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1987
- Pages
- 179-189
- OpenAlex
- W2116060004
- Cited by
- 2,003
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 331.23
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Case for Animal Rights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_15
- The paper
- Regan, T. (1987). The Case for Animal Rights. Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
