Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Gene Expression of Umbilical Cord Vein and Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Panepucci, Rodrigo A., Siufi, Jorge L.C., Silva, Wilson A., Proto‐Siquiera, Rodrigo, Neder, Luciano, Orellana, Maristela, Rocha, Vanderson, Covas, Dimas T., Zago, Marco A.·2004·STEM CELLS

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) give origin to the marrow stromal environment that supports hematopoiesis. These cells present a wide range of differentiation potentials and a complex relationship with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and endothelial cells. In addition to bone marrow (BM), MSCs can be obtained from other sites in the adult or the fetus. We isolate MSCs from the umbilical cord (UC) veins that are morphologically and immunophenotpically similar to MSCs obtained from the BM. In culture, these cells are capable of differentiating in vitro into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and condrocytes. The gene expression profiles of BM-MSCs and of UC-MSCs were compared by serial analysis of gene expression, then validated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of selected genes. The two lineages shared almost all of the first thousand most expressed transcripts, including vimentin, galectin 1, osteonectin, collagens, transgelins, annexin A2, and MMP2. Nevertheless, a set of genes related to antimicrobial activity and to osteogenesis was more expressed in BM-MSCs, whereas higher expression in UC-MSCs was observed for genes that participate in pathways related to matrix remodeling via metalloproteinases and angiogenesis. Finally, cultured endothelial cells, CD34+ HSCs, MSCs, blood leukocytes, and bulk BM clustered together, separated from seven other normal nonhematopoietic tissues, on the basis of shared expressed genes. MSCs isolated from UC veins are functionally similar to BM-MSCs, but differentially expressed genes may reflect differences related to their sites of origin: BM-MSCs would be more committed to osteogenesis, whereas UC-MSCs would be more committed to angiogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Panepucci, R. A., Siufi, J. L. C., Silva, W. A., Proto‐Siquiera, R., Neder, L., Orellana, M., Rocha, V., Covas, D. T., & Zago, M. A.
Venue
STEM CELLS
Published
2004-12
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1263-1278
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2127644172
Cited by
330
References
1
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Gene Expression of Umbilical Cord Vein and Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2004-0024
The paper
Panepucci, R. A., Siufi, J. L. C., Silva, W. A., Proto‐Siquiera, R., Neder, L., Orellana, M., Rocha, V., Covas, D. T., & Zago, M. A. (2004). Comparison of Gene Expression of Umbilical Cord Vein and Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. STEM CELLS. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2004-0024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.