Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multipotent Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord: Cord Is Richer than Blood!

Open access
Secco, Mariane, Zucconi, Eder, Vieira, Natassia M., Fogaça, Luciana L.Q., Cerqueira, Antonia, Carvalho, Maria Denise F., Jazedje, Tatiana, Okamoto, Oswaldo K., Muotri, Alysson R., Zatz, Mayana·2008·Stem Cells

Abstract

The identification of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources that are easily obtainable is of utmost importance. Several studies have shown that MSCs could be isolated from umbilical cord (UC) units. However, the presence of MSCs in umbilical cord blood (UCB) is controversial. A possible explanation for the low efficiency of MSCs from UCB is the use of different culture conditions by independent studies. Here, we compared the efficiency in obtaining MSCs from unrelated paired UCB and UC samples harvested from the same donors. Samples were processed simultaneously, under the same culture conditions. Although MSCs from blood were obtained from only 1 of the 10 samples, we were able to isolate large amounts of multipotent MSCs from all UC samples, which were able to originate different cell lineages. Since the routine procedure in UC banks has been to store the blood and discard other tissues, such as the cord and/or placenta, we believe our results are of immediate clinical value. Furthermore, the possibility of originating different cell lines from the UC of neonates born with genetic defects may provide new cellular research models for understanding human malformations and genetic disorders, as well as the possibility of testing the effects of different therapeutic drugs. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0381

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Secco, M., Zucconi, E., Vieira, N. M., Fogaça, L. L. Q., Cerqueira, A., Carvalho, M. D. F., Jazedje, T., Okamoto, O. K., Muotri, A. R., & Zatz, M.
Venue
Stem Cells
Published
2007-10-11
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
146-150
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W1990758819
Cited by
398
References
32
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multipotent Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord: Cord Is Richer than Blood! https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0381
The paper
Secco, M., Zucconi, E., Vieira, N. M., Fogaça, L. L. Q., Cerqueira, A., Carvalho, M. D. F., Jazedje, T., Okamoto, O. K., Muotri, A. R., & Zatz, M. (2008). Multipotent Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord: Cord Is Richer than Blood! Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0381

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.