Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Putative Stem Cell Phenotype in Human Limbal Epithelia

Open access
Chen, Zhuo, de Paiva, Cintia S., Luo, Lihui, Kretzer, Francis L., Pflugfelder, Stephen C., Li, De‐Quan·2004·STEM CELLS

Abstract

This study evaluated proposed molecular markers related to stem cell (SC) properties with the intention of characterizing a putative SC phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Human corneal and limbal tissues were cut in the vertical and horizontal meridians for histology, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and immunostaining. Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and in situ hybridization were used to evaluate gene expression. TEM showed that the limbal basal cells were small primitive cells. Immunostaining disclosed that p63, ABCG2 and integrin alpha9 were primarily expressed by the basal epithelial cells of limbus. Antibodies against integrin beta1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), K19, enolase-alpha, and CD71 stained the basal cells of the limbus more brightly than the suprabasal epithelia. Integrin alpha6, nestin, E-cadherin and connexin 43 did not stain the limbal basal cells, but the suprabasal epithelia of the cornea and limbus showed strong immunoreactivity. K3 and involucrin stained only corneal and limbal superficial cells. RT-PCR showed higher levels of p63, ABCG2 and integrin alpha9 mRNA, but lower levels of K3, K12 and connexin 43 expressed in the limbal epithelia than the corneal epithelia. In situ hybridization showed that p63 transcripts were located in basal layer of the limbal epithelium. This work suggests that the basal epithelial cells of the limbus are p63, ABCG2 and integrin alpha9 positive, and nestin, E-cadherin, connexin 43, involucrin, K3, and K12 negative, with relatively higher expression of integrin beta1, EGFR, K19, and enolase-alpha. This putative SC phenotype may facilitate the identification and isolation of limbal epithelial SCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-355

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z., de Paiva, C. S., Luo, L., Kretzer, F. L., Pflugfelder, S. C., & Li, D.
Venue
STEM CELLS
Published
2004-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
355-366
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2002935341
Cited by
423
References
1
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Putative Stem Cell Phenotype in Human Limbal Epithelia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.22-3-355
The paper
Chen, Z., de Paiva, C. S., Luo, L., Kretzer, F. L., Pflugfelder, S. C., & Li, D. (2004). Characterization of Putative Stem Cell Phenotype in Human Limbal Epithelia. STEM CELLS. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.22-3-355

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.