The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fertility Preservation in Young Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Explain how chemotherapy for breast cancer impacts ovarian function.Discuss the incidence of ovarian failure after chemotherapy and list the chemotherapeutic agents most likely to cause loss of fertility in breast cancer patients.Describe options for fertility preservation in women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Breast cancer accounts for one third of all neoplasms seen in reproductive-age women and affects tens of thousands of women each year in that age group. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimens used for the treatment commonly affect fertility and cause premature ovarian failure. There have been recent advances in the field of fertility preservation, which can allow many of these breast cancer survivors to have children in the future. The most established option is embryo cryopreservation; oocyte cryopreservation can be considered in single women. Both of these approaches require approximately 2 weeks of ovarian stimulation beginning with the onset of the patient's menstrual cycle. Thus, it is crucial that these patients are referred to appropriate assisted reproduction centers as soon as they are diagnosed with breast cancer. Recently developed ovarian stimulation protocols using tamoxifen and letrozole can be used to increase the margin of safety in these patients. When and if a breast cancer patient does not have time to undergo ovarian stimulation prior to chemotherapy, ovarian cryopreservation for future autotransplantation can be offered as the last resort. The benefit of ovarian protection by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues is unproven and unlikely, and thus this treatment should not be offered as the sole method of fertility preservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo
Trounson, A., & Mohr, L. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305707a0 · Cited by 1,126
Aromatase inhibition improves ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responders
Mitwally, M. F. M., & Casper, R. F. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03280-0 · Cited by 407
Mitwally, M. F. M., & Casper, R. F. (2004) · Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.jsgi.2004.03.006 · Cited by 102
Oktay, K., Buyuk, E., Akar, M., Rosenwaks, Z., & Libertella, N. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.007 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Cited by
Badawy, A., Elnashar, A., El-Ashry, M., & Shahat, M. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.044 · Cited by 331
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonmezer, M., & Oktay, K.
- Venue
- The Oncologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 422-434
- ISSN
- 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2140378688
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.