Cited by 278Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Managing Premedications and the Risk for Reactions to Infusional Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

Chung, Christine H.·2008·The Oncologist

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies—including rituximab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab—have improved the treatment of various malignancies. Although generally better tolerated with less toxicity than conventional anticancer agents, monoclonal antibodies may cause infusion-related reactions like other infusional agents. The incidence of infusion reactions varies by agent, but severe events occur only occasionally, mostly with the first or second infusion. Although the exact etiology of infusion reactions remains unclear, they may arise via either IgE- or non-IgE–dependent mechanisms. There is a compelling clinical need to improve the risk assessment for severe infusion reactions. The recent identification of pre-existing IgE crossreacting with cetuximab, its association with severe reactions, and regional variation in the prevalence may provide a marker for high-risk assessment. Premedication with antihistamines, acetaminophen, and/or corticosteroids is a common practice to prevent infusion reactions with all monoclonal antibodies. However, a recent observational study suggests that premedication may no longer be necessary after the second infusion of cetuximab if patients did not develop any symptoms with the first two infusions. Considering the heterogeneity of infusion reactions, clinicians need to recognize the underlying nature of these events in order to identify patients at risk as well as provide optimal prophylactic measures and management of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0012

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, C. H.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Chung, Christine H.
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
725-732
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2097020324
Cited by
278
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
infusion reactions, monoclonal antibodies, premedication, cetuximab, risk assessment, antihistamines, corticosteroids, paracetamol, rituximab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, panitumumab, prophylaxis
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Hypersensitivity, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Neoplasms, Premedication, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review