The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Differentiate the multiple definitions of polypharmacy in order to be able to recognize it in your patient population.Discuss the current data available in evaluating polypharmacy specifically in older adults with cancer and incorporate the data in your evaluation of older patients.Summarize the agents or drug classes that may be deemed inappropriate in older adults to avoid prescribing medications for older patients that may lead to adverse drug events. CME This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com The definition of “polypharmacy” ranges from the use of a large number of medications; the use of potentially inappropriate medications, which can increase the risk for adverse drug events; medication underuse despite instructions to the contrary; and medication duplication. Older adults are particularly at risk because they often present with several medical conditions requiring pharmacotherapy. Cancer-related therapy adds to this risk in older adults, but few studies have been conducted in this patient population. In this review, we outline the adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy and present polypharmacy definitions offered by the geriatrics literature. We also examine the strengths and weaknesses of these definitions and explore the relationships among these definitions and what is known about the prevalence and impact of polypharmacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gallagher, P., & O'Mahony, D. (2008) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afn197 · Cited by 697
Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment
Yates, J. S., Mustian, K. M., Morrow, G. R., Gillies, L. J., Padmanaban, D., Atkins, J. N., Issell, B., Kirshner, J. J., & Colman, L. K. (2005) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0770-7 · Cited by 309
Determinants of the degree of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with cancer
Shumay, D. M., Maskarinec, G., Gotay, C. C., Heiby, E. M., & Kakai, H. (2002) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/107555302320825183 · Cited by 99
Risk Factors for Fractures in the Elderly
Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Fourrier, A., Commenges, D., & Dartigues, J.-F. (1998) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199807000-00012 · Cited by 52
Cited by
How to Implement a Geriatric Assessment in Your Clinical Practice
Sattar, S., Alibhai, S. M. H., Wildiers, H., & Puts, M. T. E. (2014) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0180 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Maggiore, R. J., Gross, C. P., & Hurria, A.
- Venue
- The Oncologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-04-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 507-522
- ISSN
- 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2159091303
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0290
- The paper
- Maggiore, R. J., Gross, C. P., & Hurria, A. (2010). Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Cancer. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.