Cited by 309Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesCancer survivorship and careMedical Research and Treatments

Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment

Yates, Jennifer S., Mustian, Karen M., Morrow, Gary R., Gillies, Leslie J., Padmanaban, Devi, Atkins, James N., Issell, Brian, Kirshner, Jeffrey J. +1 more·2005·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Goals of work To assess complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies being utilized by cancer patients during treatment and communication about CAM usage between the patient and physician.Patients and methods Newly diagnosed cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy were recruited to complete a CAM survey within 2 weeks after the termination of treatment. Patients were queried on which CAM modalities they utilized and whether or not they were discussed with either their oncologist or primary care physician.Main results Of the patients surveyed, 91% reported using at least one form of CAM. The most widely used forms of CAM were prayer, relaxation and exercise. CAM users tended to be women chemotherapy patients with at least a high school education. Of the patients using CAM, 57% discussed the use of at least one of these therapies with their oncologist or primary care physician. The most frequent CAM modalities discussed with at least one physician were diets, massage, and herbal medicine.Conclusions An overwhelming proportion of cancer patients are using CAM, particularly prayer, relaxation, and exercise. However, patients may not discuss the use of CAMs at all or fully with their physician; if they do, it is most likely to be their oncologist, but not about the most frequently used CAMs. Future research needs to assess effective ways for oncologists to gather information about CAM usage by patients during allopathic treatment and discern ways these therapies may enhance or interfere with traditional cancer treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-004-0770-7

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yates, J. S., Mustian, K. M., Morrow, G. R., Gillies, L. J., Padmanaban, D., Atkins, J. N., Issell, B., Kirshner, J. J., & Colman, L. K.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Yates, Jennifer S.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2005-02-15
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
806-811
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2056555905
Cited by
309
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 28
FWCI
37.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA037420, U10-CA37420)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
complementary and alternative medicine, cancer patients, CAM use prevalence, prayer, relaxation, physical activity, physician-patient communication, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, herbal medicine, massage, diet
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review