The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is now an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosis and staging, as well as offering prognostic information based on response. This report attempts to comprehensively review the value of PET in the locoregional and distant staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), illustrate the potential effects on patient management, and give a short overview of newer applications. PET sets the gold standard in the evaluation of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule or mass, where PET has proven to be significantly more accurate than computed tomography (CT) in the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. In the evaluation of metastatic spread to locoregional lymph nodes, PET is significantly more accurate than CT, so that invasive surgical staging may be omitted in many patients with negative mediastinal PET images. In patients with positive mediastinal PET mages, invasive surgical staging remains mandatory because of the possibility of false-positive findings due to inflammatory nodes or granulomatous disorders. In the search for metastatic spread, PET is a useful adjunct to conventional imaging. This may be due to the finding of unexpected metastatic lesions or due to exclusion of malignancy in lesions that are equivocal on standard imaging. However, at this time, PET does not replace conventional imaging. Large-scale randomized studies are currently examining whether PET staging will actually improve the appearance of lung cancer outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluation of Benign vs Malignant Hepatic Lesions With Positron Emission Tomography
Delbeke, D. (1998) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.5.510 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention
Lennon, A. M., Buchanan, A. H., Kinde, I., Warren, A., Honushefsky, A., Cohain, A. T., Ledbetter, D. H., Sanfilippo, F., Sheridan, K., Rosica, D., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9601 · Cited by 657
Recent advances in apoptosis, mitochondria and drug resistance in cancer cells
Indran, I. R., Tufo, G., Pervaiz, S., & Brenner, C. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.03.010 · Cited by 526
The metabolic landscape of lung cancer: New insights in a disturbed glucose metabolism
Vanhove, K., Graulus, G.-J., Mesotten, L., Thomeer, M., Derveaux, E., Noben, J.-P., Guedens, W., & Adriaensens, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.01215 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Schrevens, L., Lorent, N., Dooms, C., & Vansteenkiste, J.
- Venue
- The Oncologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 633-643
- ISSN
- 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2108452933
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-633
- The paper
- Schrevens, L., Lorent, N., Dooms, C., & Vansteenkiste, J. (2004). The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.