Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bisphosphonates: Clinical Experience

Open access
Coleman, Robert E.·2004·The Oncologist

Abstract

Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Explain the importance of bone disease in the common solid tumors of adulthood. Describe the pathophysiology of bone metastasis. List the specialized end points used in clinical trials assessing treatment of bone disease. Discuss the current standard for the treatment and prevention of bone complications that may arise in cancer and its treatment. Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Bone is a preferred site of metastasis for many solid tumors, and the complications associated with bone metastases can result in significant skeletal morbidity including severe bone pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM). Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for preventing skeletal complications associated with bone metastases. Clinical trials investigating the benefit of bisphosphonate therapy have used a composite end point defined as a skeletal-related event (SRE) or bone event, which typically includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation or surgery to bone, and HCM. Bisphosphonates have been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of these events in patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid (Zometa®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ), pamidronate (Aredia®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.), clodronate (Bonefos®; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), and ibandronate (Bondronat®; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Nutley, NJ) all have demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has been compared directly with pamidronate, and it was shown by multiple event analysis to be significantly more effective at reducing the risk of an SRE. In patients with prostate cancer, clodronate, etidronate (Didronel®; Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Cincinnati, OH), and pamidronate have demonstrated transient palliation of bone pain. However, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate both significant and sustained pain reduction and a significantly lower incidence and longer time to onset of SREs compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is also the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in patients with bone metastases from a variety of other solid tumors, including lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. In conclusion, bisphosphonates effectively reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, and zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity in patients with a wide variety of tumor types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-14

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Coleman, R. E.
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2004-09-01
Volume
9
Issue
S4
Pages
14-27
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2141884093
Cited by
384
References
40
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bisphosphonates: Clinical Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-14
The paper
Coleman, R. E. (2004). Bisphosphonates: Clinical Experience. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-14

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.