Cited by 28Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyMarine animal studies overviewAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Proximate Nutrient Analyses of Four Species of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Consumed by Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) Compared to Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia)

Siegal-Willott, Jessica L., Harr, Kendal, Hayek, Lee-Ann C., Scott, Karen C., Gerlach, Trevor, Sirois, Paul, Reuter, Mike, Crewz, David W. +1 more·2010·Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine

Abstract

Free-ranging Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) consume a variety of sea grasses and algae. This study compared the dry matter (DM) content, proximate nutrients (crude protein [CP], ether-extracted crude fat [EE], nonfiber carbohydrate [NFC], and ash), and the calculated digestible energy (DE) of sea grasses (Thalassia testudinum, Halodule wrightii, and Syringodium filiforme) collected in spring, summer, and winter, and an alga (Chara sp.) with those of romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia). Neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), and lignin (L) measured after ash-extraction were also compared. Results of statistical tests (C = 0.01) revealed DM content was higher in aquatic vegetation than in lettuce (P = 0.0001), but NDF and ADF were up to threefold greater, EE (P = 0.00001) and CP (P = 0.00001) were 2-9 times less, and NFC (P = 0.0001) was 2-6 times lower in sea grass than in lettuce, on a DM basis. Chara was lower in NDF, ADF, L, EE, CP, and NFC relative to lettuce on a DM basis. Ash content (DM basis) was higher (P = 0.0001), and DE was 2-6 times lower in aquatic vegetation than in lettuce. Sea grass rhizomes had lower L and higher ash contents (DM basis) than sea grass leaves. Based on the nutrient analyses, romaine lettuce and sea grasses are not equivalent forages, which suggests that the current diet of captive Florida manatees should be reassessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1638/2009-0118.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegal-Willott, J. L., Harr, K., Hayek, L.-A. C., Scott, K. C., Gerlach, T., Sirois, P., Reuter, M., Crewz, D. W., & Hill, R. C.
Affiliations
Smithsonian Institution (US)
Corresponding author
  • Siegal-Willott, Jessica L.
  • Harr, Kendal
  • Hayek, Lee-Ann C.
  • Scott, Karen C.
  • Gerlach, Trevor
  • Sirois, Paul
  • Reuter, Mike
  • Crewz, David W.
  • Hill, Richard C.
Venue
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Published
2010-12
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
594-602
ISSN
  • 1042-7260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-2825
OpenAlex
W2147669509
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Florida
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
Florida manatee, Trichechus manatus latirostris, seagrass, Thalassia testudinum, Halodule wrightii, Syringodium filiforme, Chara, romaine lettuce, forage nutritional composition, digestible energy, fiber content, aquatic plants
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Animals, Wild, Feeding Behavior, Nutritive Value, Lactuca, Trichechus manatus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review