The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INFLUENCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES ON RACCOON (PROCYON LOTOR) MOVEMENTS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
Abstract
Abundance and distribution of food resources can profoundly affect movements and spatial distribution of solitary carnivores. Food availability and distribution are often altered in urbanized systems due to occurrence of abundant and highly concentrated anthropogenic resources. To address effects of these resources on movements and spatial distribution of raccoons (Procyon lotor), we simultaneously studied populations inhabiting urban (Ned Brown Forest Preserve), suburban (Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation), and rural (Glacial Park) open areas in northeastern Illinois. Estimates of sizes of home ranges were smaller for urban (range, 25.2–52.8 ha, n = 29) and suburban (21.4–37.2 ha, n = 34) than rural (71.2–182.4 ha, n = 39) raccoons during all seasons (P < 0.05). Seasonal changes in sizes of home ranges were least pronounced at the suburban site. Seasonal shifts in activity centers also were small for raccoons at the suburban site and for most raccoons at the urban site. Spatial distribution was aggregated during all seasons at the urban site, and during all seasons except summer 1997 at the suburban site. Abundant and relatively stable artificial resources typical of urbanized systems contributed to reduced size and increased stability of home ranges. Further, concentration of these resources into rich and separated patches resulted in an aggregated distribution. Similar responses to abundant and concentrated resources have been documented for solitary carnivores in other, more natural, systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Carnivore Social Behaviour
Macdonald, D. W. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/301379a0 · Cited by 1,192
Cited by
Big City Life: Carnivores in Urban Environments
Bateman, P. W., & Fleming, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x · Cited by 832
The cognition of ‘nuisance’ species
Barrett, L. P., Stanton, L. A., & Benson-Amram, S. (2019) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.005 · Cited by 166
Baumann, C. (2023) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-023-01764-x · Cited by 35
Den use and heterothermy during winter in free-living, suburban striped skunks
Theimer, T. C., Williams, C. T., Johnson, S. R., Gilbert, A. T., Bergman, D. L., & Buck, C. L. (2017) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx009 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-490
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2181047536
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INFLUENCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES ON RACCOON (PROCYON LOTOR) MOVEMENTS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1644/bos-121
- The paper
- Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P. (2004). INFLUENCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES ON RACCOON (PROCYON LOTOR) MOVEMENTS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.1644/bos-121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.