Cited by 39Radiation Therapy and DosimetryEffects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biology

Relative effectiveness at 1 Gy after acute and fractionated exposures of heavy ions with different linear energy transfer for lung tumorigenesis

Wang, Xiang, Farris III, Alton B., Wang, Ping, Zhang, Xiangming, Wang, Hongyan, Wang, Ya·2015·Radiation Research

Abstract

Space radiation, which is comprised of high-energy charged (HZE) particles with different high-linear energy transfer (LET), induces more severe biological effects than the Earth's radiation. NASA has mandated that risk estimates of carcinogenesis induced by exposure to HZE particles with different LET be determined before conducting human explorations of Mars. Because lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in humans, it is critical the risk of that radiation-induced lung tumorigenesis be included when estimating the risks of space radiation to astronauts. To address this, we examined the incidence of lung tumorigenesis in wild-type C57BL/6 mice at 1.5 years after 1 Gy exposure (single or fractionated dose) to different types of radiation with different LET (iron, silicon, oxygen and X ray). We chose wild-type mice for this study because previous studies of radiation-induced lung tumorigenesis using mutant mice models (either downregulated tumor suppressors or upregulated oncogenes) may not accurately reflect the response of healthy individuals (astronauts) to space radiation. Our study clearly showed that HZE particles (iron, silicon and oxygen) induced a higher incidence of lung tumorigenesis than X rays, and that their relative effectiveness at 1 Gy was >6. In addition, we found that silicon exposure appears to induce more aggressive lung tumors. These results provide valuable information for future followup experiments to s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rr13884.1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Farris III, A. B., Wang, P., Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Ya
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2015-02
Volume
183
Issue
2
Pages
233-239
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W1976096611
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA138292)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
space radiation, HZE particles, heavy ions, linear energy transfer, iron, silicon, oxygen, X-rays, lung cancer risk, astronaut radiation risk, wild-type mice, tumor aggressiveness
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Cosmic Radiation, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Radiation Dosage, Risk Factors, United States, Whole-Body Irradiation, Incidence, Linear Energy Transfer, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Heavy Ions, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review