Cited by 89Effects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Therapy and DosimetryRadiation Dose and Imaging

Animal models for radiation injury, protection and therapy

Augustine, Alison Deckhut, Gondré-Lewis, Timothy, McBride, William, Miller, Lara, Pellmar, Terry C., Rockwell, Sara·2005·Radiation Research

Abstract

Current events throughout the world underscore the growing threat of different forms of terrorism, including radiological or nuclear attack. Pharmaceutical products and other approaches are needed to protect the civilian population from radiation and to treat those with radiation-induced injuries. In the event of an attack, radiation exposures will be heterogeneous in terms of both dose and quality, depending on the type of device used and each victim's location relative to the radiation source. Therefore, methods are needed to protect against and treat a wide range of early and slowly developing radiation-induced injuries. Equally important is the development of rapid and accurate biodosimetry methods for estimating radiation doses to individuals and guiding clinical treatment decisions. Acute effects of high-dose radiation include hematopoietic cell loss, immune suppression, mucosal damage (gastrointestinal and oral), and potential injury to other sites such as the lung, kidney and central nervous system (CNS). Long-term effects, as a result of both high- and low-dose radiation, include dysfunction or fibrosis in a wide range of organs and tissues and cancer. The availability of appropriate types of animal models, as well as adequate numbers of animals, is likely to be a major bottleneck in the development of new or improved radioprotectors, mitigators and therapeutic agents to prevent or treat radiation injuries and of biodosimetry methods to measure radiation doses to individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rr3388

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Augustine, A. D., Gondré-Lewis, T., McBride, W., Miller, L., Pellmar, T. C., & Rockwell, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Augustine, Alison Deckhut
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2005-07
Volume
164
Issue
1
Pages
100-109
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2139273336
Cited by
89
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
Keywords
animal models, radiation injury, radiation protection, radioprotective agents, biological dosimetry, radiation dose assessment, nuclear attack, mucosal injury, radiation-induced cancer, organ fibrosis, radiotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Protection, Radiation-Protective Agents, Research Design, Drug Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review