The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical Radioprotection and Radiosensitization of Mammalian Cells Growing in Vitro
Abstract
The radiosensitizing and radioprotective effects of various compounds have been characterized in Chinese hamster fibroblasts growing in vitro and in a model chemical system utilizing DNA as target. The contribution to the lethal action of ionizing radiation in mammalian cells from the indirect effect of OH has been measured. The data are consistent with the “oxygen fixation hypothesis,” whereby target free radicals react either with radical-reducing species, resulting in “chemical repair,” or with radical-oxidizing species, resulting in “fixation” of radical damage to a potentially lethal form. Radical repair–fixation competition has been demonstrated in the in vitro chemical system with a sensitizer other than O2.Dimethyl sulfoxide is shown to radioprotect in both the cellular and chemical systems by scavenging OH. Cysteamine, on the other hand, is shown to protect primarily by adding to the pool of radical-reducing species, resulting in enhanced repair of free-radical damage in the targets. Electron-affinic compounds are shown to radiosensitize, predominantly, by adding to the pool of radical-oxidizing species, resulting in enhanced fixation of free-radical damage in the targets. Diamide is shown to radiosensitize mammalian cells by a mechanism which is additive to that of the electron-affinic compounds. N-Ethylmaleimide shows radiosensitizing characteristics, in mammalian cells, which, in some respects, are qualitatively similar to those of Diamide. These compounds may radiosensitize cells by chemically and/or biochemically altering the pool of radical-reducing species in the vicinity of the cellular targets, resulting in enhanced fixation of radical damage in the targets by endogenous radical-oxidizing species. The oxygen enhancement ratio for hamster cells is shown to depend upon the intracellular target environment, and can be made to vary between near 1 and 3.3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ward, J. F., Blakely, W. F., & Joner, E. I. (1985) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3576760 · Cited by 306
Contributions of direct and indirect actions in cell killing by high-LET radiations
Hirayama, R., Ito, A., Tomita, M., Tsukada, T., Yatagai, F., Noguchi, M., Matsumoto, Y., Kase, Y., Ando, K., Okayasu, R., et al. (2009) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1490.1 · Cited by 159
Minor contribution of direct ionization to DNA base damage inducedby heavy ions
Douki, T., Ravanat, J.-L., Pouget, J.-P., Testard, I., & Cadet, J. (2006) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553000600573788 · Cited by 106
Brownlee, N. R., Huttner, J. J., Panganamala, R. V., & Cornwell, D. G. (1977) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)41605-0 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, J. D., Reuvers, A. P., Borsa, J., & Greenstock, C. L.
- Venue
- Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Radiation Research Society
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- AV214-AV222
- ISSN
- 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2074470990
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Radioprotection and Radiosensitization of Mammalian Cells Growing in Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1667/rrav18.1
- The paper
- Chapman, J. D., Reuvers, A. P., Borsa, J., & Greenstock, C. L. (2012). Chemical Radioprotection and Radiosensitization of Mammalian Cells Growing in Vitro. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.1667/rrav18.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.