A new specimen of Sauripterus taylori(Sarcopterygii, Osteichthyes) from the Famennian Catskill Formation of North America
Abstract
A new specimen of the rhizodontid sarcopterygian, Sauripterus taylori (Sarcopterygii, Osteichthyes), from the Late Devonian (Famennian) Catskill Formation of Pennsylvania consists of a well-preserved right pectoral fin, girdle, and associated scales. Rhizodontid affinity is supported by the unique pattern of overlap between the clavicle and cleithrum, the robustness of the pectoral girdle, the presence of elongate and unjointed lepidotrichia in the pectoral fin, and the pattern of connectivity between the endochondral bones of the pectoral fin. The new specimen of Sauripterus provides a three-dimensional and articulated view of basal rhizodontid pectoral girdle and fin anatomy and preserves the first known scapulocoracoid for a Devonian rhizodontid. The glenoid fossa faces posteroventrally, in contrast to the more posterolaterally facing glenoids of other tetrapodomorph fish. The humerus is short proximodistally and possesses an expansive ventral flange for the attachment of the adductor, flexor, and rotatory musculature of the fin. Together, these data suggest that the pectoral fins of Sauripterus were optimized for adduction and flexion against the water column or a solid substrate. To maximize the propulsive force of these motions the distal fin was stiffened by the presence of eight radiais, similar in position to the autopodials of tetrapods. However, unlike the digits of tetrapods, the unit that interacts with the environment in rhizodontids is a combined structure consisting of both dermal and endochondral fin skeletons. As recent phylogenetic hypotheses do not support a sister-group relationship between rhizodontids and tetrapods, the similarities between the endoskeletal radiais of Sauripterus and the autopodium of tetrapods are independently derived.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fin rays of Sauripterus are presumed to represent only the proximal portion of a large fin web, as observed in juveniles.
“The fin rays are unsegmented and presumed to represent only the proximal portion of a large fin web, as is observed in juveniles (Fig. 1B) (20, 33).”
From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
More posterior rays have tapering bases and are circular in cross-section with a hollow core.
“These anterior-most rays are dorsoventrally flattened and have broad bases, while the more posterior rays have tapering bases and are circular in their cross-section with a hollow core (20).”
From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
Detailed anatomical description of dermal rays is lacking, in part due to taphonomic bias.
“Detailed anatomical description of dermal rays is lacking, in part, due to taphonomic bias.”
From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
Fin rays spanning endoskeletal joints is predicted to restrict movement at the articular surfaces of the endoskeleton and stiffen the fin lobe.
“This is predicted to restrict movement at the articular surfaces of the endoskeleton and stiffen the fin lobe (20).”
From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan
Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04639 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Self-citationThe origin and early phylogenetic history of jawed vertebrates
Brazeau, M. D., & Friedman, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14438 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition
Stewart, T. A., Lemberg, J. B., Taft, N. K., Yoo, I., Daeschler, E. B., & Shubin, N. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1915983117 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“This is predicted to restrict movement at the articular surfaces of the endoskeleton and stiffen the fin lobe (20).”
InfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Davis, M. C., Shubin, N., & Daeschler, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-40
- ISSN
- 0272-4634 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2809
- OpenAlex
- W2000200925
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
- National Geographic Society
- Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- Sarcopterygii, shoulder girdle, scapulocoracoid, glenoid fossa, lepidotrichia, autopodium, tetrapod evolution, Catskill Formation, Famennian, Late Devonian
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review