Cited by 77Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationWetland Management and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Landscape Features on Waterbird Use of Rice Fields

King, Sammy, Elphick, Chris S., Guadagnin, Demetrio, Taft, Oriane, Amano, Tatsuya·2010·Waterbirds

Abstract

Literature is reviewed to determine the effects of landscape features on waterbird use of fields in regions where rice (Oryza sativa) is grown. Rice-growing landscapes often consist of diverse land uses and land cover, including rice fields, irrigation ditches, other agricultural fields, grasslands, forests and natural wetlands. Numerous studies indicate that local management practices, such as water depth and timing of flooding and drawdown, can strongly influence waterbird use of a given rice field. However, the effects of size and distribution of rice fields and associated habitats at a landscape scale have received less attention. Even fewer studies have focused on local and landscape effects simultaneously. Habitat connectivity, area of rice, distance to natural wetlands, and presence and distance to unsuitable habitat can be important parameters influencing bird use of rice fields. However, responses to a given landscape vary with landscape structure, scale of analysis, among taxa and within taxa among seasons. A lack of multi-scale studies, particularly those extending beyond simple presence and abundance of a given species, and a lack of direct tests comparing the relative importance of landscape features with in-field management activities limits understanding of the importance of landscape in these systems and hampers waterbird conservation and management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1675/063.033.s111

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ditches can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates, waterbirds, amphibians, macrophytes and fish.

    “and can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates 106,187 ), waterbirds 188,189 , amphibians 190 , macrophytes 191,192 and fish 193,194 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Antas P. T. Z., 1983, Wader Study Group Bulletin, 39, 52
  2. Blanco D. E., 2006, Use of rice fields by migratory shore-birds in southern South America: implications for conservation and management.
  3. Haig S. M., 1998, Conservation Biology, 12, 749, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97102.x · DOI
  4. Huner J. V., 2002, U.S.A. Waterbirds, 25, 66
  5. Naugle D. E., 1999, Landscape Ecology, 14, 267, 10.1023/A:1008088429081 · DOI
  6. Pierluissi S., 2008, Waterbirds, 31, 530
  7. Remsen J. V., 1991, Journal of Louisiana Ornithology, 1, 35
  8. Rettig V. E., 1994, Use of agricultural fields by migrating and wintering shorebirds in southwest Louisiana.
  9. van Weerd M., 2004, Forktail, 20, 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
King, S., Elphick, C. S., Guadagnin, D., Taft, O., & Amano, T.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
King, Sammy
Venue
Waterbirds
Published
2010-12
Volume
33
Issue
sp1
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 1524-4695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5390
OpenAlex
W2179413052
Cited by
77
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waterbirds (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wetland Management and Conservation
Keywords
paddy fields, landscape elements, habitat connectivity, landscape structure, natural wetlands, multiscale analysis, waterbird conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review