Cited by 23Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchEstrogen and related hormone effectsHormonal and reproductive studies

Relative potencies of flutamide and casodex: preclinical studies.

Luo, S, Martel, C, LeBlanc, G, Candas, B, Singh, S M, Labrie, C, Simard, J, Belanger, A +1 more·1996·Endocrine Related Cancer

Abstract

Abstract After 3 h of incubation at room temperature, hydroxyFlutamide, the active metabolite of Flutamide (Eulexin), and Casodex (bicalutamide), an analog of Flutamide, have comparable potency to displace [3H]R1881 from the human prostate and rat ventral prostate androgen receptors contrary to the previous claims that Casodex was four times more potent using different incubation conditions. Binding data, in fact, must be interpreted with caution, since they are very much dependent upon the duration and temperature of incubation. In the more appropriate intact cell situation, hydroxyFlutamide is approximately three times more potent than Casodex at inhibiting dihydrotestosterone-stimulated proliferation of androgen-sensitive mouse Shionogi carcinoma cells in vitro. Under in vivo conditions, in the orchiectomized rat supplemented with androstenedione implants, Flutamide is about three times more potent than Casodex at inhibiting ventral prostate and seminal vesicle weight. When both compounds were administered for 7 days to intact rats, Flutamide and Casodex showed similar apparent potency. However, taking into account the much higher plasma levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in intact animals treated with Flutamide compared with those treated with Casodex, the estimated potency of Flutamide in the intact rat is also at least three times higher than that of Casodex. The present data, contrary to previous claims based upon the inappropriate intact rat model clearly show that Flutamide is at least three times more potent than Casodex in rat and mouse tissues. These data are opposite to those obtained in the inappropriate intact rat model where Casodex was reported to be five to ten times more potent than Flutamide. Using more appropriate models of androgen action, the present data thus indicate a 15- to 30-fold lower estimate of the potency of Casodex. Since the choice of the dose of Casodex to be used for the treatment of prostate cancer patients is based upon such a large overestimate of the true potency of Casodex, the present data should help the choice of a more appropriate dose of this antiandrogen for the treatment of prostate cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer (1996) 3 229-241

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/erc.0.0030229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, S., Martel, C., LeBlanc, G., Candas, B., Singh, S. M., Labrie, C., Simard, J., Belanger, A., & Labrie, F.
Venue
Endocrine Related Cancer
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
229-241
ISSN
  • 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6821
OpenAlex
W1983806503
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Endocrine Related Cancer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
flutamide, bicalutamide, hydroxyflutamide, androgen receptor binding, relative potency, prostate cancer, androgen receptor antagonists, prostate weight, seminal vesicle, dose selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review