The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INDUCTION OF SUPEROVULATION AND PREGNANCY IN MATURE MICE BY GONADOTROPHINS
Abstract
SUMMARY: 1. The injection of 1 i.u. pregnant mares' serum (PMS) followed after 40 hr by 2 i.u. human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), or of 3 i.u. PMS followed by 3 i.u. HCG into mature female mice selected at random with regard to their oestrous cycle induces oestrus and mating in approximately 75%, and ovulation in 99% of them. 2. The induction of superovulation depends on the amount of PMS injected and on the strain of mice used. 3. Two types of egg are ovulated, one being normal and with a cumulus, the other degenerated and without cumulus. 93% of the normal eggs were fertilized and 98% of the pronucleate eggs possessed two pronuclei. 4. Approximately three-quarters of the females which mate in response to the injected gonadotrophins become pregnant, although this number was less than the number becoming pregnant after mating during natural oestrus. Many of the treated females carried their embryos to term and some gave birth to large litters, although resorptions, irregular distribution of embryos in the uterus, and difficulty during parturition occurred in some females. Mean litter size of the treated females was similar to that found after natural mating. 5. After more than one treatment with gonadotrophins, fewer females mated, ovulated, and became pregnant than after the first treatment. This reduction in response may have been due to the greater age of the females or to their decreased sensitivity to the hormones. 6. The value of the method as a technique for inducing oestrus, ovulation, and pregnancy in mature female mice is considered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The literature suggests healthy viable pups are routinely born to wildtype females after superovulation protocols”
From Conditional loss of ERK1 and ERK2 results in abnormal placentation and delayed parturition in the mouse (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BEAUMONT, H. M., & SMITH, A. F. (1975) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0450437 · Cited by 64
Brown, J. L., Sones, J. L., Angulo, C. N., Abbott, K., Miller, A. D., Boehm, U., & Roberson, M. S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45997-0 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- FOWLER, R. E., & EDWARDS, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 1957-09-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-384
- ISSN
- 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6805
- OpenAlex
- W2035582388
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- superovulation, pregnancy induction, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, ovulation, estrus induction, fertilisation (biology), litter size
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Estrus, Female, Gonadotropins, Ovulation, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Superovulation, Estrous Cycle, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review