Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential Staining of Collagens Type I, II and III by Sirius Red and Polarization Microscopy

Open access
JUNQUEIRA, L. C. U., COSSERMELLI, W., BRENTANI, R.·1978·Archivum histologicum japonicum

Abstract

Organs of fish, amphibian, reptile, bird and mammals when stained by Sirius Red and studied with polarization microscopy present different colors in regions where collagens I, II and III have been described. Collagen type I presented a yellow, orange or red color while collagen type III appeared green. Collagen type II, present in cartilage and chondrosarcoma showed a variable color according to the tissue and the species. Its color and morphology however always permitted its clear distinction from collagens type I and type III.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1679/aohc1950.41.267

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
JUNQUEIRA, L. C. U., COSSERMELLI, W., & BRENTANI, R.
Venue
Archivum histologicum japonicum
Published
1978
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
267-274
ISSN
0004-0681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050729770
Cited by
587
References
0
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Staining of Collagens Type I, II and III by Sirius Red and Polarization Microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1679/aohc1950.41.267
The paper
JUNQUEIRA, L. C. U., COSSERMELLI, W., & BRENTANI, R. (1978). Differential Staining of Collagens Type I, II and III by Sirius Red and Polarization Microscopy. Archivum histologicum japonicum. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc1950.41.267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.