Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydration of alkali-activated slag: comparison with ordinary Portland cement

Gruskovnjak, A., Lothenbach, B., Holzer, L., Figi, R., Winnefeld, F.·2006·Advances in Cement Research

Abstract

A multi-method approach was used for the investigation and comparison of alkali-activated slag binders (AAS), pure slag and ordinary Portland cement (OPC). X-ray fluorescence, X-ray powder diffraction, granulometry, calorimetry, thermo-gravimetric analysis and environmental scanning electron microscope investigations of the microstructure with energy dispersive X-ray analyses were used to characterise the cements and their hydrate phases. In addition, the chemical composition of the pore solution, including the different sulphur-containing ions, was analysed. The precipitation mechanisms during binder hydration in the AAS and OPC systems exhibit significant differences: in AAS the formation of the ‘outer product’ C-S-H is much faster than in OPC. The high Si concentrations in the pore solution during the early hydration of AAS are related to the fast dissolution of Na-metasilicate. The fast reaction of Na is an important factor for the voluminous precipitation of C-S-H within the interstitial space already during the first 24 h. In addition to the Na-metasilicate component, the high fineness of the slag represents a further important factor for the fast hydration of AAS. The small slag particles (< 2 μm) are completely dissolved or hydrated within the first 24 h, whereas hydration of the larger particles is much slower. The fast formation of a gel-like matrix in AAS is the product of a fast ‘through solution’ precipitation, which contrasts with the slower dissolution-precipitation mechanism of a ‘topotactic’ growth of C-S-H in OPC. The chemical and mineralogical characterisation of solid and liquid phases and their changes with time are the basis for thermodynamic modelling of the corresponding hydration process, which is presented in a second paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1680/adcr.2006.18.3.119

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Gruskovnjak, A., Lothenbach, B., Holzer, L., Figi, R., & Winnefeld, F.
Venue
Advances in Cement Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-07
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
119-128
ISSN
  • 0951-7197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7605
OpenAlex
W2105003203
Cited by
349
References
24
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydration of alkali-activated slag: comparison with ordinary Portland cement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1680/adcr.2006.18.3.119
The paper
Gruskovnjak, A., Lothenbach, B., Holzer, L., Figi, R., & Winnefeld, F. (2006). Hydration of alkali-activated slag: comparison with ordinary Portland cement. Advances in Cement Research. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2006.18.3.119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.