Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Achieved Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial

Berl, Tomas, Hunsicker, Lawrence G., Lewis, Julia B., Pfeffer, Marc A., Porush, Jerome G., Rouleau, Jean-Lucien, Drury, Paul L., Esmatjes, Enric, Hricik, Donald, Pohl, Marc, Raz, Itamar, Vanhille, Philippe, Wiegmann, Thomas B., Wolfe, Bernard M., Locatelli, Francesco, Goldhaber, Samuel Z., Lewis, Edmund J.·2005·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Elevated arterial pressure enhances the risk for cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The optimal BP and the component of the elevated BP that affect the risk have not been defined. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess the impact of achieved systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures on CV outcomes in 1590 adults who had overt diabetic nephropathy and were enrolled in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and had a baseline serum creatinine above the normal range, up to 266 micromol/L (3.0 mg/dL), 24-h urine protein >900 mg/d, and at least 6 mo of follow-up. Patients were randomized to irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo, with other antihypertensive agents to a BP goal of < or =135/85 mmHg. Progressively lower achieved systolic BP (SBP) to 120 mmHg predicted a decrease in CV mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF) but not myocardial infarctions (MI). A SBP below this threshold was associated with increased risk for CV deaths and CHF events. Achieved diastolic BP <85 mmHg was associated with a trend to increase in all-cause mortality, significant increase in MI, but decreased risk for strokes. Increased pulse pressure predicted increased all-cause mortality, CV mortality, MI, and CHF. It is concluded that achieved SBP approaching 120 mmHg and diastolic BP of 85 mmHg are associated with the best protection against CV events in these patients. BP < or =120/85 may be associated with an increase in CV events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2004090763

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Berl, T., Hunsicker, L. G., Lewis, J. B., Pfeffer, M. A., Porush, J. G., Rouleau, J.-L., Drury, P. L., Esmatjes, E., Hricik, D., Pohl, M., Raz, I., Vanhille, P., Wiegmann, T. B., Wolfe, B. M., Locatelli, F., Goldhaber, S. Z., & Lewis, E. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2005-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
2170-2179
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143208696
Cited by
322
References
11
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Achieved Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2004090763
The paper
Berl, T., Hunsicker, L. G., Lewis, J. B., Pfeffer, M. A., Porush, J. G., Rouleau, J.-L., Drury, P. L., Esmatjes, E., Hricik, D., Pohl, M., Raz, I., Vanhille, P., Wiegmann, T. B., Wolfe, B. M., Locatelli, F., Goldhaber, S. Z., & Lewis, E. J. (2005). Impact of Achieved Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2004090763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.