The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association Among SF36 Quality of Life Measures and Nutrition, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Hemodialysis
Open accessAbstract
Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) often show substantial reductions in quality of life (QoL). The SF36 (Short Form with 36 questions), a well-documented, self-administered QoL scoring system that includes eight independent scales and two main dimensions, has been widely used and validated. In 65 adult outpatients on MHD, the SF36 and its scales and dimensions, scored as a number between 0 and 100, and the nutritional and inflammatory state measured by subjective global assessment, near-infrared (NIR) body fat, body mass index (BMI), and pertinent laboratory values, including hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein were assessed. Twelve-month prospective hospitalization rates and mortality were used as the clinical outcomes. Multivariate (case-mix) adjusted correlation coefficients were statistically significant between SF36 scores and serum albumin and hemoglobin concentrations. There were significant inverse correlations between SF36 scores and the BMI and NIR body fat percentage. Hypoalbuminemic, anemic, and obese patients on MHD had a worse QoL. Prospective hospitalizations correlated significantly with the SF36 total score and its two main dimensions (r between -0.28 and -0.40). The Cox proportional regression relative risk of death for each 10 unit decrease in SF36 was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.98; P = 0.02). Of the eight components and two dimensions of the SF36, the Mental Health dimension and the SF36 total score had the strongest predictive value for mortality. Thus, in patients on MHD the SF36 appears to have significant associations with measures of nutritional status, anemia, and clinical outcomes, including prospective hospitalization and mortality. Even though obesity, unlike undernutrition, is not generally an indicator of poor outcome in MHD, the SF36 may detect obese patients on MHD at higher risk for morbidity and mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does positive affect influence health?
Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925 · Cited by 2,087
Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?
Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9 · Cited by 1,646
Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2008) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e31818105ba · Cited by 1,592
Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults
Villareal, D. T., Chode, S., Parimi, N., Sinacore, D. R., Hilton, T., Armamento-Villareal, R., Napoli, N., Qualls, C., & Shah, K. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1008234 · Cited by 1,096
Appetite and inflammation, nutrition, anemia, and clinical outcome in hemodialysis patients
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Block, G., McAllister, C. J., Humphreys, M. H., & Kopple, J. D. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.2.299 · Cited by 630
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kopple, J. D., Block, G., & Humphreys, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2797-2806
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147055256
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Among SF36 Quality of Life Measures and Nutrition, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Hemodialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v12122797
- The paper
- Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kopple, J. D., Block, G., & Humphreys, M. H. (2001). Association Among SF36 Quality of Life Measures and Nutrition, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Hemodialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v12122797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.