The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival in hemodialysis patients: the role of depression.
Abstract
Depression has been identified at the most prevalent psychologic problem in patients with ESRD treated with hemodialysis (HD). Depression has been associated with mortality in HD patients; however, the similarity of the symptoms of depressive disorders to those of uremia and the difficulties in measuring depression and dissociating psychologic from physical aspects of depression in such patients render these studies difficult to evaluate. Conflicting data regarding the effects of depression on survival in HD patients may be the result of using somatic symptoms in quantifying the extent of depression. In this review, studies regarding the diagnosis of depression in HD patients, the association of depression and survival in HD patients in light of recent work on factors related to the morbidity and mortality in the ESRD population, and aspects of therapy for depression in HD patients are considered. Specifically, depression may affect immunologic function, nutrition, and compliance factors that may affect the prescription and delivery of dialysis, which may, in turn, influence outcome. Alternatively, depression may be an independent factor in influencing survival. Cognitive depression measures may be more useful in predicting outcome in HD patients than standard measures used in nonmedically ill populations. Although there are few studies of the effect of treatment of depression on outcome in HD patients, it is reasonable to hypothesize that treatment of depressive disorders in HD patients might effect outcome. Further studies on the association of depression and its treatment and mortality in ESRD patients are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
Social Relationships and Health
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3399889 · Cited by 7,073
Cited by
(2000) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.90.2.251 · Cited by 1,020
Psychosocial factors in dialysis patients
Kimmel, P. L. (2001) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590041599.x · Cited by 391
Self-citationPsychosocial Aspects of Chronic Disease: ESRD as a Paradigmatic Illness
Cukor, D., Cohen, S. D., Peterson, R. A., & Kimmel, P. L. (2007) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2007030345 · Cited by 385
Self-citationHedayati, S. S., Bosworth, H. B., Kuchibhatla, M., Kimmel, P. L., & Szczech, L. A. (2006) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000308 · Cited by 309
Self-citationDepression in patients with chronic renal disease
Kimmel, P. L. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00310-0 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimmel, P. L., Weihs, K., & Peterson, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-27
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097884351
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival in hemodialysis patients: the role of depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v4112
- The paper
- Kimmel, P. L., Weihs, K., & Peterson, R. A. (1993). Survival in hemodialysis patients: the role of depression. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v4112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.