The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.
Abstract
The objective of the study presented here was to evaluate the relationship of adequacy of dialysis and nutritional status to mortality, technique failure, and morbidity. This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients commencing continuous peritoneal dialysis in 14 centers in Canada and the United States. Between September 1, 1990 and December 31, 1992, 680 patients were enrolled. Follow-up was terminated December 31, 1993. There were 90 deaths, 137 transplants, and 118 technique failures. Fifteen withdrew from dialysis. Analysis of the patient and technique survival used the Cox proportional hazards model with adequacy of dialysis and nutritional status as time-dependent covariates. The relative risk (RR) of death increased with increased age, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, decreased serum albumin concentration and worsened nutritional status (subjective global assessment and percentage lean body mass). A decrease of 0.1 unit Kt/V per week was associated with a 5% increase in the RR of death; a decrease of 5 L/1.73 m2 creatinine clearance (CCr) per week was associated with a 7% increase in the RR of death. The RR of technique failure was increased with decreased albumin concentration and decreased CCr. Hospitalization was increased with decreased serum albumin concentration, worsened nutrition according to subjective global assessment and decreased CCr. A weekly Kt/V of 2.1 and a weekly CCr of 70 L/1.73 m2 were each associated with an expected 2-yr survival of 78%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
KDOQI clinical practice guideline for nutrition in CKD: 2020 update
Ikizler, T. A., Burrowes, J. D., Byham-Gray, L. D., Campbell, K. L., Carrero, J.-J., Chan, W., Fouque, D., Friedman, A. N., Ghaddar, S., Goldstein-Fuchs, D. J., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.006 · Cited by 1,960
Survival advantages of obesity in dialysis patients
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Abbott, K. C., Salahudeen, A. K., Kilpatrick, R. D., & Horwich, T. B. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.3.543 · Cited by 610
Kopple, J. D., Greene, T., Chumlea, W. C., Hollinger, D., Maroni, B. J., Merrill, D., Scherch, L. K., Schulman, G., Wang, S.-R., & Zimmer, G. S. (2000) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00014.x · Cited by 398
Early Control of PTH and FGF23 in Normophosphatemic CKD Patients: A New Target in CKD-MBD Therapy?
Oliveira, R. B., Cancela, A. L. E., Graciolli, F. G., Dos Reis, L. M., Draibe, S. A., Cuppari, L., Carvalho, A. B., Jorgetti, V., Canziani, M. E., & Moysés, R. M. A. (2010) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.05420709 · Cited by 357
Relative contributions of nutrition and inflammation to clinical outcome in dialysis patients
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., & Kopple, J. D. (2001) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/ajkd.2001.29250 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-207
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4247429830
- Cited by
- 1,109
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v72198
- The paper
- Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. (1996). Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v72198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.