Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 442

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aging and the kidney.

Epstein, M·1996·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

A host of abnormalities of renal structure and function accompanies advancing age. An appreciation of methodologic considerations, including population selection, that might confound the assessment of the effects of aging on renal function has prompted a recent reappraisal. Earlier studies assessed the effects of aging by utilizing cross-sectional studies and institutionalized elderly subjects, with their attendant drawbacks. Recent longitudinal studies have utilized appropriate patient cohorts, selected for lock of renal disease, including potential kidney transplant donors. These studies indicate that the morphological and functional changes of aging tend to be less marked than previously thought. The common denominator of these functional changes is a diminution in renal reserve, along with constraints on the kidney's ability to respond appropriately to challenges of either excesses or deficits. Although these alterations are unlikely to be of major clinical consequence under everyday conditions, they attain clinical significance when residual renal function is challenged by the superimposition of an acute illness. Finally, it should be emphasized that elderly patients frequently suffer from comorbid conditions, such as hypertension and heart disease, that may be additive to the changes of aging, thereby amplifying these abnormalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.v781106

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
1996-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
1106-1122
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2240587738
Cited by
442
References
0
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.