The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tubulointerstitial disease in aging: evidence for underlying peritubular capillary damage, a potential role for renal ischemia.
Abstract
Aging is associated with a progressive decline in renal function and the development of glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Although many studies have addressed the cellular mechanisms of age-related glomerulosclerosis, less is known about the tubulointerstitial fibrosis. In this study, aging (24 mo) rats develop tubulointerstitial fibrosis characterized by tubular injury and focal tubular cell proliferation, myofibroblast activation, macrophage infiltration with increased immunostaining for the adhesive proteins osteopontin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and collagen IV deposition. Aging rats demonstrated immunostaining for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOSIII) in renal tubular epithelial cells and infiltrating mononuclear cells in areas of tubulointerstitial injury, with a relative loss of staining of the peritubular capillaries compared with young rats. The aging rats also displayed focal loss of peritubular capillaries (as noted by focally decreased RECA-1 and OX-2 staining) in areas of tubulointerstitial injury. The areas of fibrosis and hypocellularity were associated with increased apoptosis of tubular and interstitial cells compared with young (3 mo) rats (25.4 +/- 5.3 versus 3.5 +/- 2.5 TUNEL-positive cells/0.25 mm2 in old versus young rats, P = 0.0001). It is concluded that tubulointerstitial fibrosis in aging is an active process associated with interstitial inflammation and fibroblast activation. The progressive loss of cells in areas of fibrosis may be due to accelerated apoptosis. Furthermore, the tubulointerstitial injury may be the consequence of ischemia secondary to peritubular capillary injury and altered eNOS expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis
Zeisberg, M., & Neilson, E. G. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2010080793 · Cited by 868
The Association Between Age and Nephrosclerosis on Renal Biopsy Among Healthy Adults
Rule, A. D., Amer, H., Cornell, L. D., Taler, S. J., Cosio, F. G., Kremers, W. K., Textor, S. C., & Stegall, M. D. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-9-201005040-00006 · Cited by 503
Role of the Microvascular Endothelium in Progressive Renal Disease
Kang, D.-H., Kanellis, J., Hugo, C., Truong, L., Anderson, S., Kerjaschki, D., Schreiner, G. F., & Johnson, R. J. (2002) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.v133806 · Cited by 466
Self-citationSubtle Acquired Renal Injury as a Mechanism of Salt-Sensitive Hypertension
Johnson, R. J., Herrera-Acosta, J., Schreiner, G. F., & Rodríguez-Iturbe, B. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011078 · Cited by 448
Self-citationBasile, D. P., Donohoe, D., Roethe, K., & Osborn, J. L. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00050.2001 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, S. E., Anderson, S., Gordon, K. L., Oyama, T. T., Shankland, S. J., & Johnson, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-242
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1917944294
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tubulointerstitial disease in aging: evidence for underlying peritubular capillary damage, a potential role for renal ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v92231
- The paper
- Thomas, S. E., Anderson, S., Gordon, K. L., Oyama, T. T., Shankland, S. J., & Johnson, R. J. (1998). Tubulointerstitial disease in aging: evidence for underlying peritubular capillary damage, a potential role for renal ischemia. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v92231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.