The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study
Abstract
This study presents results from a randomized controlled clinical trial of the Mirror Image Movement Enabler (MIME) robotic device for shoulder and elbow neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke patients, including data on the use of its bilateral training mode. MIME incorporates a PUMA 560 robot (Staubli Unimation Inc, Duncan, South Carolina) that applies forces to the paretic limb during unilateral and bilateral movements in three dimensions. Robot-assisted treatment (bilateral, unilateral, and combined bilateral and unilateral) was compared with conventional therapy. Similar to a previous study in chronic stroke, combined unilateral and bilateral robotic training had advantages compared with conventional therapy, producing larger improvements on a motor impairment scale and a measure of abnormal synergies. However, gains in all treatment groups were equivalent at the 6-month follow-up. Combined unilateral and bilateral training yielded functional gains that were similar to the gains from equivalent doses of unilateral-only robotic training, although the combined group had more hypertonia and less movement out of synergy at baseline. Robot-assisted treatment gains exceeded those expected from spontaneous recovery. These results are discussed in light of the need for further device development and continued clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance
Fugl-Meyer, A., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197771331 · Cited by 5,564
Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity
Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/67.2.206 · Cited by 5,424
Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.
Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C., Connell, J., & Crago, J. E. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,557
Robot-aided neurorehabilitation
Krebs, H. I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M. L., & Volpe, B. T. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.662623 · Cited by 1,425
Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 · Cited by 1,159 · cited 1×
“Our initial clinical testing goal was to compare a therapy program of robotic manipulation with an equally intensive program of conventional therapy techniques [23].”
MethodAdult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment
Bobath, B. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 971
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
Van Peppen, R. P., Kwakkel, G., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hendriks, H. J., Van der Wees, P. J., & Dekker, J. (2004) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215504cr843oa · Cited by 942
Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Twisk, J. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 938
van der Lee, J. H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., Vogelaar, T. W., Devillé, W. L., & Bouter, L. M. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.11.2369 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review
Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., & Pollock, A. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4 · Cited by 2,319
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Krebs, H. I. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307305457 · Cited by 1,503
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 · Cited by 1,182
Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., & Elsner, B. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub4 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Loos, M. V. D., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Yap, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 631
- ISSN
- 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
- 0748-7711
- OpenAlex
- W2022787437
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0044
- The paper
- Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Loos, M. V. D., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Yap, R. (2006). MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
