The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective
Open accessAbstract
User acceptance of myoelectric forearm prostheses is currently low. Awkward control, lack of feedback, and difficult training are cited as primary reasons. Recently, researchers have focused on exploiting the new possibilities offered by advancements in prosthetic technology. Alternatively, researchers could focus on prosthesis acceptance by developing functional requirements based on activities users are likely to perform. In this article, we describe the process of determining such requirements and then the application of these requirements to evaluating the state of the art in myoelectric forearm prosthesis research. As part of a needs assessment, a workshop was organized involving clinicians (representing end users), academics, and engineers. The resulting needs included an increased number of functions, lower reaction and execution times, and intuitiveness of both control and feedback systems. Reviewing the state of the art of research in the main prosthetic subsystems (electromyographic [EMG] sensing, control, and feedback) showed that modern research prototypes only partly fulfill the requirements. We found that focus should be on validating EMG-sensing results with patients, improving simultaneous control of wrist movements and grasps, deriving optimal parameters for force and position feedback, and taking into account the psychophysical aspects of feedback, such as intensity perception and spatial acuity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1982) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(82)90076-5 · Cited by 9,089
A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control
Hudgins, B., Parker, P., & Scott, R. N. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.204774 · Cited by 2,149
A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.813539 · Cited by 1,743
(1985) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/0165-0327(85)90062-x · Cited by 1,254
Myoelectric control systems—A survey
Asghari Oskoei, M., & Hu, H. (2007) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009 · Cited by 1,244
Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications
(2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471678384 · Cited by 1,151
Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years
Biddiss, E. A., & Chau, T. T. (2007) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640600994581 · Cited by 1,111
Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems
Kaczmarek, K. A., Webster, J. G., Bach-y-Rita, P., & Tompkins, W. J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.68204 · Cited by 827
A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., Hudgin, B., & Parker, P. A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.914793 · Cited by 697
Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment
Biddiss, E., & Chau, T. (2007) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e3181587f6c · Cited by 645
Cited by
Atzori, M., Cognolato, M., & Müller, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009 · Cited by 684
“However, average results are usually below 80–90% (Peerdeman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundXu, B., Akhtar, A., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Yeo, W., Park, S. I., Boyce, B., Kim, H., Yu, J., Lai, H., et al. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504155 · Cited by 304
Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use
Farina, D., Vujaklija, I., Brånemark, R., Bull, A. M. J., Dietl, H., Graimann, B., Hargrove, L. J., Hoffmann, K.-P., Huang, H., Ingvarsson, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00732-x · Cited by 263
Prosthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective
Roche, A. D., Rehbaum, H., Farina, D., & Aszmann, O. C. (2014) · Current Surgery Reports · doi:10.1007/s40137-013-0044-8 · Cited by 261
Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review
Shull, P. B., & Damian, D. D. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0055-z · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Peerdeman, B., Boere, D., Witteveen, H., Huis in `tVeld, R., Hermens, H., Stramigioli, S., Rietman, H., Veltink, P., & Misra, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 719
- ISSN
- 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
- 0748-7711
- OpenAlex
- W2977419794
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1682/jrrd.2010.08.0161
- The paper
- Peerdeman, B., Boere, D., Witteveen, H., Huis in `tVeld, R., Hermens, H., Stramigioli, S., Rietman, H., Veltink, P., & Misra, S. (2011). Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2010.08.0161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
