Cited by 17Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceptions of other integrative health therapies by Veterans with pain who are receiving massage

Open access
Fletcher, Carol Elizabeth, Mitchinson, Allison R., Trumble, Erika L., Hinshaw, Daniel B., Dusek, Jeffery A.·2016·Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Abstract

Veterans are increasingly using complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies to manage chronic pain and other troubling symptoms that significantly impair health and quality of life. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is exploring ways to meet the demand for access to CIH, but little is known about Veterans' perceptions of the VA's efforts. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted interviews of 15 inpatients, 8 receiving palliative care, and 15 outpatients receiving CIH in the VA. Pain was the precipitating factor in all participants' experience. Participants were asked about their experience in the VA and their opinions about which therapies would most benefit other Veterans. Participants reported that massage was well-received and resulted in decreased pain, increased mobility, and decreased opioid use. Major challenges were the high ratio of patients to CIH providers, the difficulty in receiving CIH from fee-based CIH providers outside of the VA, cost issues, and the role of administrative decisions in the uneven deployment of CIH across the VA. If the VA is to meet its goal of offering personalized, proactive, patient-centered care nationwide then it must receive support from Congress while considering Veterans' goals and concerns to ensure that the expanded provision of CIH improves outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1682/jrrd.2015.01.0015

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrative medicine has been shown to be effective in treating complex medical conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, pain and depression.

    “Integrative medicine is an approach that combines traditional and complementary medicine (e.g., yoga, acupuncture, biofeedback) and has been shown to be effective in treating complex medical conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, pain and depression.3À6”

    From A complementary and integrative health group-based program pilot demonstrates positive health outcomes with female Veterans. (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results (Experience; page not provided) report that Veterans receiving massage experienced pain relief and described reduced depression. The paper does not address multiple sclerosis, and its participants’ reports do not establish that integrative medicine broadly is effective in treating all three conditions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ezeji-Okoye, 2013, State of care: Complementary and alternative medicine in Veterans Health Administration—2011 survey results, Fed Pract, 30, 14
  2. Bent, 2004, Use of complementary and alternative therapies among veterans: A pilot study, Fed Pract, 21, 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fletcher, C. E., Mitchinson, A. R., Trumble, E. L., Hinshaw, D. B., & Dusek, J. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Published
2016
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
117-126
ISSN
  • 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-7711
  • 1938-1352
OpenAlex
W2411756403
Cited by
17
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006518)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
complementary and integrative health, veterans, chronic pain, massage, palliative care, patient perspectives, Department of Veterans Affairs, opioid use reduction, health care access, cost barriers, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Perception, Pilot Projects, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Health Care Surveys, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review