Agroecological transition, innovation and lock-in effects: The impact of the organizational design of supply chains
Open accessAbstract
The French agricultural production system has to evolve towards more environmentally friendly practices. Although research is developing new agricultural cropping systems, getting them adopted by the agricultural profession remains difficult. This technological lock-in effect can be explained by a set of self-reinforcement mechanisms, which strengthen a productive choice established initially in favor of an agriculture based on intensive use of inputs, at the expense of other alternatives. This work aims at analyzing the organizational structure of the durum wheat supply chain to assess the characteristics that are likely to speed-up or restrain the adoption of new production systems. Our results show that the low degree of integration of the supply chain can be viewed as a lock-in mechanism. Therefore, the organizational structure of the supply chain itself can play the role of a self-reinforcement mechanism that reduces the incentives to adopt new practices. The literature on sociotechnical transitions shows that a solution to unlock the system is to create small and highly integrated supply chains (niches), besides the traditional agro-industrial supply chains. The question is then how the value generated by these niche supply chains has to be shared in order to give enough incentives to producers to choose new (and more costly) practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History
(1995) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036867 · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Schot, J. (1998) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/07341519808581928 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agroecological transitions: a mathematical perspective on a transdisciplinary problem
Ong, T. W. Y., & Liao, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00091 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Angeon, V., & Bates, S. (2020) · Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine · doi:10.3917/reru.203.0503 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fares, M., Magrini, M.-B., & Triboulet, P.
- Affiliations
- AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (FR)
- ORCID
- Triboulet, Pierre
- Venue
- Cahiers Agricultures
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-45
- ISSN
- 1166-7699 (ISSN-L)
- 1777-5949
- OpenAlex
- W2133735178
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 20.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Cahiers Agricultures (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-STRA-11, ANR-09-STRA-06)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- agroecological transition, technological lock-in, socio-technical transitions, value sharing, French agriculture, agro-industrial supply chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review