Cited by 77Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policiesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Agroecological transition, innovation and lock-in effects: The impact of the organizational design of supply chains

Open access
Fares, M’hand, Magrini, Marie-Benoit, Triboulet, Pierre·2012·Cahiers Agricultures

Abstract

The French agricultural production system has to evolve towards more environmentally friendly practices. Although research is developing new agricultural cropping systems, getting them adopted by the agricultural profession remains difficult. This technological lock-in effect can be explained by a set of self-reinforcement mechanisms, which strengthen a productive choice established initially in favor of an agriculture based on intensive use of inputs, at the expense of other alternatives. This work aims at analyzing the organizational structure of the durum wheat supply chain to assess the characteristics that are likely to speed-up or restrain the adoption of new production systems. Our results show that the low degree of integration of the supply chain can be viewed as a lock-in mechanism. Therefore, the organizational structure of the supply chain itself can play the role of a self-reinforcement mechanism that reduces the incentives to adopt new practices. The literature on sociotechnical transitions shows that a solution to unlock the system is to create small and highly integrated supply chains (niches), besides the traditional agro-industrial supply chains. The question is then how the value generated by these niche supply chains has to be shared in order to give enough incentives to producers to choose new (and more costly) practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1684/agr.2012.0539

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fares, M., Magrini, M.-B., & Triboulet, P.
Affiliations
AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (FR)
Venue
Cahiers Agricultures
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2012-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
34-45
ISSN
  • 1166-7699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1777-5949
OpenAlex
W2133735178
Cited by
77
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
20.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Cahiers Agricultures (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-STRA-11, ANR-09-STRA-06)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
agroecological transition, technological lock-in, socio-technical transitions, value sharing, French agriculture, agro-industrial supply chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review