Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historical Monetary Policy Analysis and the Taylor Rule

Open access
Orphanides, Athanasios·2003·Finance and Economics Discussion Series

Abstract

This study examines the usefulness of the Taylor-rule framework as an organizing device for describing the policy debate and evolution of monetary policy in the United States. Monetary policy during the 1920s and since the 1951 Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord can be broadly interpreted in terms of this framework with rather surprising consistency. In broad terms, during these periods policy has been generally formulated in a forward-looking manner with price stability and economic stability serving as implicit or explicit guides. As early as the 1920s, measures of real economic activity relative to "normal" or "potential" supply appear to have influenced policy analysis and deliberations. Confidence in such measures as guides for activist monetary policy proved counterproductive at times, resulting in excessive activism, such as during the Great Inflation and at the brink of the Great Depression. Policy during the past two decades is broadly consistent with natural-growth targeting variants of the Taylor rule that exhibit less activism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17016/feds.2003.36

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Batini, N., Haldane A., 1999. Forward-looking Rules for Monetary Policy. In Taylor, 1999. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.147549
  2. Batini, N., Nelson, E., 2000. Optimal Horizons for Inflation Targeting. Bank of England Working Paper 119, July. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.237150
  3. 10.1515/9780691187396 · doi:10.1515/9780691187396
  4. 10.2307/1180269 · doi:10.2307/1180269
  5. Burgess, W.R., 1930. Guide to Bank of Issue Policy. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 13(4), 508-513, January. · doi:10.2307/1172646
  6. Burgess, W.R., 1936. The Reserve Banks and the Money Market. Second Edition, Harper and Brothers, New York.
  7. Brunner, K., Meltzer, A.H., 1993. Money and the Economy: Issues in Monetary Analysis. The Rafaelle Mattioli Lectures, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  8. 10.3386/w8970 · doi:10.3386/w8970
  9. 10.2307/1991045 · doi:10.2307/1991045
  10. 10.2307/1991080 · doi:10.2307/1991080
  11. 10.1086/260085 · doi:10.1086/260085
  12. 10.1080/01621459.1923.10502134 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1923.10502134
  13. 10.1086/260048 · doi:10.1086/260048
  14. Friedman, M. 1968. The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 58(1), March, 1-17.
  15. Friedman, M., Schwartz, A.J., 1963. A Monetary History of the United States: 1867-1960. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
  16. Goldenweiser, E., Hagen, E.E., 1944. Jobs After the War. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 30(5), May 1944.
  17. Greenspan, A., 1997. Rules vs. discretionary monetary policy, Remarks at the 15th An- niversary Conference of the Center for Economic Policy Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, September 5.
  18. 10.1017/s0305741000047251 · doi:10.1017/s0305741000047251
  19. 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90011-k · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90011-k
  20. Hetzel, R.L., Leach, R.F., 2001. The Treasury-Fed Accord: A New Narrative Account. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Quarterly, 87(1), 33-55, Winter.
  21. Horwich, G. (Ed.), 1967. Monetary Process and Policy: A Symposium. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
  22. Kuroda, I. (Ed.), 1997. Towards More Effective Monetary Policy. St Martin's Press, New York. · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25382-1
  23. 10.1162/00346530151143761 · doi:10.1162/00346530151143761
  24. Leffingwell, R. C., 1921. The Discount Policy of the Federal Reserve Banks: Discussion. American Economic Review, 11(1), 30-36, March.
  25. 10.2139/ssrn.148695 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.148695
  26. 10.1016/0304-3932(90)90029-4 · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(90)90029-4
  27. 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90010-t · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90010-t
  28. 10.1257/aer.91.2.258 · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.258
  29. McCallum, B.T., Nelson, E., 1999. Performance of Operational Policy Rules in an Esti- mated Semiclassical Structural Model. In Taylor, 1999. · doi:10.3386/w6599
  30. Meltzer, A.H., 2003. A History of the Federal Reserve: Volume I, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  31. Miller, A.C., 1921. Federal Reserve Policy. American Economic Review, 11(2), 177-206, June.
  32. Mishkin, F.S., 2002. The Role of Output Stabilization in the Conduct of Monetary Policy. NBER Working Paper, 9291, October. · doi:10.3386/w9291
  33. Okun, A., 1962. Potential Output: Its Measurement and Significance. In American Statis- tical Association 1962 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section, Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.
  34. Orphanides, A., 2003d. Monetary Policy in Deflation: The Liquidity Trap in History and Practice. Working Paper, April. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.512962
  35. 10.17016/feds.2004.68 · doi:10.17016/feds.2004.68
  36. 10.7208/chicago/9780226044736.003.0006 · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226044736.003.0006
  37. 10.1177/000271622512200138 · doi:10.1177/000271622512200138
  38. 10.1093/cep/byg024 · doi:10.1093/cep/byg024
  39. Reed, H., 1930. Federal Reserve Policy, 1921-1930, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  40. Romer, C.D., Romer, D.H., 2002. A Rehabilitation of Monetary Policy in the 1950s. Amer- ican Economic Review, 92(2), 121-127, May. · doi:10.1257/000282802320189113
  41. 10.3386/w6618 · doi:10.3386/w6618
  42. Samuelson, P., 1951. Principles and Rules in Modern Fiscal Policy. Reprinted in Stiglitz (Ed.), 1966.
  43. 10.1080/01621459.1923.10502128 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1923.10502128
  44. Sprague, O.M.W., 1921. The Discount Policy of the Federal Reserve Banks. American Economic Review, 11(1), 16-29, March.
  45. Staiger, D., Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W., 1997. How Precise are Estimates of the Natu- ral Rate of Unemployment? In Reducing Inflation: Motivation and Strategy, ed. by Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 195- 246.
  46. Stiglitz, J.E. (Ed.), 1966. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume II, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  47. 10.1016/0167-2231(85)90027-2 · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(85)90027-2
  48. Taylor, J.B., 1997. Policy Rules as a Means to Monetary Policy. In Kuroda, 1997. · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25382-1_2
  49. Taylor, J.B., 1999b. A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules. In Taylor, 1999. · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.2307/1992166 · doi:10.2307/1992166
  51. 10.5962/bhl.title.16842 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.16842
  52. 10.5962/bhl.title.55582 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.55582
  53. Woodford, M., 2002. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy, in preparation for Princeton University Press.
  54. 10.1215/00182702-22-3-465 · doi:10.1215/00182702-22-3-465
  55. 10.3386/w3965 · doi:10.3386/w3965

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Orphanides, A.
Venue
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Published
2003-06
Volume
2003.0
Issue
36
Pages
1-49
ISSN
1936-2854 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121923649
Cited by
308
References
32
FWCI
33.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical Monetary Policy Analysis and the Taylor Rule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17016/feds.2003.36
The paper
Orphanides, A. (2003). Historical Monetary Policy Analysis and the Taylor Rule. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2003.36

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.