Cited by 80Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The role of cerebellum in unipolar and bipolar depression: a review of the main neurobiological findings

Open access
Minichino, Amedeo, Bersani, Francesco Saverio, Trabucchi, Guido, Albano, Gabriella, Primavera, Martina, Delle Chiaie, Roberto, Biondi, Massimo·2014·Rivista di Psichiatria

Abstract

summary. Evidences from studies on patients with overt cerebellar diseases as well as on healthy individuals suggest a possible role for the cerebellum in cognition, mood and behaviour. The aim of the present study is to review those neuroimaging studies examining the cerebellum in Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and to illustrate a possible role of cerebellum in their pathophysiological mechanisms. Cellular and molecular findings from post mortem studies such as mitochondria abnormalities, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its high affinity receptor tyrosine kinase B, transcription factor specificity protein 4, the glial fibrillary acidic protein have also been reviewed. In total 28 studies have been included in the review; among these, 12 studies were related to structural and functional neuroimaging of cerebellum in BD, 13 studies to structural and functional neuroimaging in MDD and 4 studies to cellular and molecular issues. This wealth of evidence from contemporary studies, indicating that the cerebellum (vermis in particular) is engaged in the modulation of emotional processing, provides strong support for the clinical relevance of cerebellar-limbic connections, and is in agreement with earlier clinical and electrophysiological studies that lead to the indication of the cerebellum as an “emotional pacemaker”.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1708/1551.16907

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abnormalities in the cerebellum may contribute to impairments in social prediction.

    “Thus, abnormalities in the cerebellum -a common substrate in mood disorders given its role in emotion regulation (Schutter and Van Honk, 2005) -may contribute to impairments in social prediction (Minichino et al., 2014).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Minichino et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minichino, A., Bersani, F. S., Trabucchi, G., Albano, G., Primavera, M., Delle Chiaie, R., & Biondi, M.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Rivista di Psichiatria
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
124-31
ISSN
0035-6484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W239264043
Cited by
80
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rivista di psichiatria (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cerebellum, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, cerebellar vermis, emotional processing, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial fibrillary acidic protein, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Cerebellum, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Humans, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review