Cited by 57Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sample size determination for repeated measures design using G Power software

Open access
Kang, Hyun·2015·Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17085/apm.2015.10.1.6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The need for an appropriate sample size calculation has become a major trend in research.

    “Although there have been debates on sample size calculation and power analysis [3,4,6], the need for an appropriate sample size calculation has become a major trend in research [1,2,7-11].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kang, H.
Corresponding author
Kang, Hyun
Venue
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Published
2015-01-31
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
6-15
ISSN
  • 1975-5171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2383-7977
OpenAlex
W2317984725
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
sample size determination, repeated measures designs, statistical power analysis, clinical trial design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review