The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013) · Nursing & Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12048 · Cited by 8,327
Self-citationQualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
Tracy, S. J. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410383121 · Cited by 7,536
What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited
Sandelowski, M. (2010) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20362 · Cited by 4,975
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
Bengtsson, M. (2016) · NursingPlus Open · doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 · Cited by 4,616
Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper
Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002 · Cited by 3,195
Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry
Morse, J. M. (2015) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315588501 · Cited by 2,809
Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2013) · Cited by 2,621
Cited by
Blurring the Boundaries between Leisure and Work: Professionals as Devotees in the Mind-Sport Bridge
Russell, Z., Punch, S., & McIntosh, I. (2022) · International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure · doi:10.1007/s41978-021-00099-y · Cited by 17
What is the lived experience of anxiety for people with Parkinson’s? A phenomenological study
Lovegrove, C. J., & Bannigan, K. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249390 · Cited by 15
Zheng, W., & Cheung Tse, A. W. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) · doi:10.1109/tale56641.2023.10398319 · Cited by 13
A Duty to Care: Male Perspectives on the Caregiver Role for Persons With Alzheimer’s or Dementia
Bueno, M. V. (2025) · Journal of Family Nursing · doi:10.1177/10748407231222291 · Cited by 13
Unaware, Unfunded and Uneducated: A Systematic Review of SME Cybersecurity
Junior, C. R., Becker, I., & Johnson, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17186 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. R.
- Venue
- Forum qualitative Sozialforschung
- Publisher
- Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 1438-5627 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980370088
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 110.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
- The paper
- Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. R. (2019). Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
