MASC 2.0, un outil d’évaluation multicritère pour estimer la contribution des systèmes de culture au développement durable
Open accessAbstract
Current changes in the field of agriculture encourage stakeholders to envision new and more sustainable production methods. For this purpose, tools are needed to assess the proposed or newly designed solutions before they are taken to the fields and disseminated. MASC 2.0 is a multi-criteria assessment tool designed to assess the performance of cropping systems in terms of their sustainability. It was based on a decision support system (DEXi) which aggregates 39 qualitative criteria in a single tree. This tool applies to a wide range of situations. It can therefore be used to identify the best cropping systems in a given territory (ex post assessment) or design prototypes of cropping systems (ex ante assessment). Thanks to its flexibility, MASC 2.0 offers users the opportunity to propose their own vision of sustainable development by changing the weight given to each evaluation criterion. Its friendly and simple interface makes this tool a privileged support for exchanges and mediation between researchers, extension workers, farmers, and public authorities. Its main drawbacks are the time spent to fill in all the criteria and the inherent limitations related to the given scale (cropping system) in relation to the larger scales more often used to handle sustainable development issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Soil compaction induced by agricultural equipment is highly dependent on the water status of the soil.
“As soil compaction induced by agricultural equipment is highly dependent on the water status of the soil, the Proportion of crops harvested in wet conditions (NWHC) was identified as an indirect indicator highlighting a likely compaction risk [29].”
From An Actor-Oriented Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework to Support a Transition towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems Based on Crop Diversification (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations
Nemecek, T., von Richthofen, J. S., Dubois, G., Casta, P., Charles, R., & Pahl, H. (2008) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.004 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems
Bockstaller, C., Girardin, P., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (1997) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(97)00041-5 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationrotat, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations
Dogliotti, S., Rossing, W. A. H., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00047-3 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Sadok, W., Angevin, F., Bergez, J.-É., Bockstaller, C., Colomb, B., Guichard, L., Réau, R., Messéan, A., & Doré, T. (2009) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro/2009006 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationLópez‐Ridaura, S., van Keulen, H., van Ittersum, M. K., & Leffelaar, P. A. (2005) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-003-6976-x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Bohanec, M., Messéan, A., Scatasta, S., Angevin, F., Griffiths, B. S., Krogh, P. H., Žnidaršič, M., & Džeroski, S. (2008) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.016 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationElaboration à dire d'experts de systèmes de culture innovants
Lançon, J., Réau, R., Cariolle, M., Munier-Jolain, N. M., Omon, B., Petit, M.-S., Viaux, P., & Wéry, J. (2008) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Systèmes de culture innovants et durables
Bockstaller, C., Galan, M.-B., Capitaine, M., Colomb, B., Mousset, J., & Viaux, P. (2008) · Éducagri éditions eBooks · doi:10.3917/edagri.reau.2008.01.0029 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationJeuffroy, M., Bergez, J.-É., David, C., Flénet, F., Gate, P., Loyce, C., Maupas, F., Meynard, J.-M., Réau, R., & Surleau, C. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationMesséan, A., Pelzer, E., Bockstaller, C., Lamine, C., & Angevin, F. (2023) · HAL · doi:10.17180/28re-fr04 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationColomb, B., Glandières, A., Aveline, A., Carof, M., Fontaine, L., & Craheix, D. (2010) · HAL · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo separate steps for cropping system assessment : characterisation and final evaluation
Fortino, G., & Réau, R. (2010) · HAL · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.-A., Justes, E., Journet, E.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.-E., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Self-citationIssues in evaluating sustainability of farming systems with indicators
Bockstaller, C., Feschet, P., & Angevin, F. (2015) · OCL · doi:10.1051/ocl/2014052 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationCraheix, D., Angevin, F., Doré, T., & de Tourdonnet, S. (2016) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.002 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationCraheix, D., Bergez, J.-É., Angevin, F., Bockstaller, C., Bohanec, M., Colomb, B., Doré, T., Fortino, G., Guichard, L., Pelzer, E., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0315-0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationIocola, I., Angevin, F., Bockstaller, C., Catarino, R., Curran, M., Messéan, A., Schader, C., Stilmant, D., Van Stappen, F., Vanhove, P., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12135434 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationLeclère, M., Loyce, C., & Jeuffroy, M. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.08.006 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Colomb, B., Carof, M., Aveline, A., & Bergez, J.-É. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-012-0126-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationRavier, C., Prost, L., Jeuffroy, M., Wezel, A., Paravano, L., & Réau, R. (2014) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Bergez, J.-É. (2012) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2012.08.010 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationPeigné, J., Lefèvre, V., Craheix, D., Angevin, F., & Capitaine, M. (2015) · Cahiers Agricultures · doi:10.1684/agr.2015.0737 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of decision support tools for strawberry production in Quebec
Gendron, M. (2018) · doi:10.82308/44250 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Craheix, D., Angevin, F., Bergez, J.-É., Bockstaller, C., Colomb, B., Guichard, L., Reau, R., & Doré, T.
- Affiliations
- Agronomie (FR)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Laboratoire Agronomie et Environnement (FR)
- Venue
- INRA
- Publisher
- INRA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 35-48
- OpenAlex
- W2337364299
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- INRAE (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
- Keywords
- multi-criteria decision making, cropping systems, sustainable agriculture, decision support system, sustainable development, stakeholder mediation, agricultural extension, sustainability criteria weighting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
