The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Handbook of Laser Synthesis & Processing of Colloids
Open accessAbstract
Two decades after the first colloidal nanoparticles were generated with a laser, more than 350 institutes all over the world are actively involved in the synthesis and processing of nanoparticles by laser ablation. If 3 students per institute would work in this field we would have a total of 1000 students that are eager to make their way into academia or industry using this laser-based method. Different terminologies such as “pulsed laser ablation/fragmentation/melting in liquids (LAL/LFL/LML)” or “Laser Ablation Synthesis in Solution (LASiS)“ are used to describe the field that this book is about. If you want to know more about LASIK (Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or simply laser eye surgery), then you are wrong here and should consider reading another book. But if you want to know more about the practical aspects of the exciting field, which we call overall “laser synthesis and processing of colloids (LSPC)” then you are at the right address.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When the pulse duration is longer than the electron-phonon relaxation time, usually a few picoseconds for metals, 55 the energy received by the material will be dissipated to the atom lattice of the material as heat and subsequent melting, leading to a lower process yield.”
From Green nanoparticle synthesis at scale: a perspective on overcoming the limits of pulsed laser ablation in liquids for high-throughput production (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khairani, I. Y., Mínguez-Vega, G., Doñate-Buendía, C., & Gökce, B. (2023) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d3cp01214j · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barcikowski, S., Amendola, V., Lau, M., Marzun, G., Rehbock, C., Reichenberger, S., Zhang, D., & Gökce, B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- DuEPublico: Duisburg-Essen Publications online, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Publisher
- DuEPublico: Duisburg-Essen Publications online, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Published
- 2019-09-30
- OpenAlex
- W2978894908
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
- Keywords
- laser ablation in liquid, pulsed laser ablation, LASIK, colloidal nanoparticles, nanoparticle synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review