The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report
Abstract
Executive Summary Introduction Origins of the National Health Care Quality Report The IOM Committee on the National Quality Report on HealthCare Delivery Defining Health Care Quality Recent Initiatives on Health Care Quality and Quality Reporting Other National and International Initiatives on Health Care Quality Measurement National Initiatives State Initiatives International Initiatives Quality Measurement and Reporting in Other Sectors Objectives of the National Health Care Quality Report Organization of the IOM Report Defining the Contents of the Data Set: The National Health Care Quality Framework Recommendation Importance of the Framework National Health Care Quality Framework Overview Components of Health Care Quality Consumer Perspectives on Health Care Needs Consumer Perspectives on Health Care Needs as Reflected in Care for Specific Health Conditions Using a Matrix to Portray the Framework Equity in Quality of Care as a Cross-Cutting Issue in the Framework what About Efficiency? Summary Selecting Measures for the National Health Care Quality Data Set Recommendations Examining Potential Measure Selection Criteria Criteria for Selecting Individual Measures for the National Health Care Quality Data Set Major Aspects to Consider Specific Aspects to Consider When Selecting Measures Evaluating Individual Measures According to the Criteria Evaluation Criteria for the National Health Care Quality Measure Set Balance Comprehensiveness Robustness Measure Selection Process Steps in the Process of Measure Selectior Role of an Advisory Body Reviewing and Updating the Measure Set Measuring Health Care Quality Comprehensively Types of Measures Role of Summary Measures Measures of the Structure, Processes, and Outcomes of Health Care Summary Data Sources for the National Health Care Quality Report Recommendations Data Source Selection Criteria Credibility and Validity of the Data National Scope and Potential to Provide State-Level Detail Availability and Consistency of the Data Over Time and Across Sources Timeliness of the Data Ability to Support Subgroup- and Condition-Specific Analyses Public Accessibility of the Data Potential Data Sources Public Data Sources Private Data Sources Evaluating Data Sources for the National Health Care Quality Data Set in the Short Term Coverage of Health Care Quality Components Data Sources for the National Health Care Quality Report Data Sources in the Short Term Encouraging the Long-Term Development of Electronic Clinical Data Systems Increasing the Access to the National Health Care Quality Data Set Summary Designing the National Health Care Quality Report Recommendation Audiences for the National Health Care Quality Report Report Guidelines Defining the Content of the Quality Report Presenting Information in the Quality Report Audience Testing the National Health Care Quality Report Audience Testing Before Report Releases Evaluative Testing of Report Releases Promoting the Quality Report Communication Channels Partnerships Evaluating the Promotion Plan Summary Appendices A Workshop: Envisioning a National Quality Report on Health Care B Designing a Comprehensive National Report on Effectiveness of Care: Measurement, Data Collection, and Reporting Strategies C Submissions in Response to the Committee's Call for Measures from the Private Sector D Selected Approaches to Thinking About the National Health Care Quality Report E Quality Measure Selection Criteria Glossary Acronyms and Abbreviations Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
(2006) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.00.00000 · Cited by 1,602
Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare
Farahani, B., Firouzi, F., Chang, V., Badaroglu, M., Constant, N., & Mankodiya, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.04.036 · Cited by 983
Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review
Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004 · Cited by 849
A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project
Arah, O. A., Westert, G. P., Hurst, J., & Klazinga, N. S. (2006) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl024 · Cited by 802
Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes
Robinson, J. H., Callister, L. C., Berry, J. A., & Dearing, K. A. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Venue
- National Academies Press eBooks
- Publisher
- National Academies Press
- Published
- 2001-03-22
- OpenAlex
- W576877101
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17226/10073
- The paper
- Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. (2001). National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/10073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.