The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deterrence and the Death Penalty
Open accessAbstract
Many studies during the past few decades have sought to determine whether the death penalty has any deterrent effect on homicide rates. Researchers have reached widely varying, even contradictory, conclusions. Some studies have concluded that the threat of capital punishment deters murders, saving large numbers of lives; other studies have concluded that executions actually increase homicides; still others, that executions have no effect on murder rates. Commentary among researchers, advocates, and policymakers on the scientific validity of the findings has sometimes been acrimonious. Against this backdrop, the National Research Council report Deterrence and the Death Penalty assesses whether the available evidence provides a scientific basis for answering questions of if and how the death penalty affects homicide rates. This new report from the Committee on Law and Justice concludes that research to date on the effect of capital punishment on homicide rates is not useful in determining whether the death penalty increases, decreases, or has no effect on these rates. The key question is whether capital punishment is less or more effective as a deterrent than alternative punishments, such as a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Yet none of the research that has been done accounted for the possible effect of noncapital punishments on homicide rates. The report recommends new avenues of research that may provide broader insight into any deterrent effects from both capital and noncapital punishments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences
National Research Council (2014) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/18613 · Cited by 648
Self-citationChater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002023 · Cited by 710
Deterrence: A Review of the Evidence by a Criminologist for Economists
Nagin, D. S. (2013) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310 · Cited by 417
The Intelligent Lockdown: Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the NetherlandsPreprint
Kuiper, M. E., de Bruijn, A. L., Folmer, C. R., Olthuis, E., Brownlee, M., Kooistra, E. B., Fine, A., & van Rooij, B. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5wdb3 · Cited by 123
Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data
Cox, L. A. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2018.1518404 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- National Research Council
- Corresponding author
- National Research Council
- Venue
- National Academies Press eBooks
- Publisher
- National Academies Press
- Published
- 2012-04-26
- OpenAlex
- W1598111140
- Semantic Scholar
- 173f3d9500896dda6dcb3d58203e515b5a7932bb
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- National Academies Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- death penalty, deterrence, homicide rates, murder, life imprisonment without parole, criminal justice policy, research validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deterrence and the Death Penalty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17226/13363
- The paper
- National Research Council. (2012). Deterrence and the Death Penalty. National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/13363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.