Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

US-China Education Review A

Open access
·2025·US-China Education Review A

Abstract

Teacher collaboration is a cornerstone for enhancing both the educational environment and professional development. This paper explores how collegial interaction among secondary school educators can influence their sense of professional identity. Through a mixed-method study, incorporating a literature review and data from a survey of 488 teachers in the Varese province, we uncover a disconnect between the acknowledged importance of collaboration and its perceived relevance to professional self-conception. Our findings suggest that while collaboration is recognized, it does not play a central role in shaping teachers' professional identities. We propose the integration of collaborative frameworks, such as Communities of Practice and Change Laboratories, in teacher training programs to promote experiential learning and peer knowledge sharing, fostering enhanced educational outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17265/2161-623x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Venue
US-China Education Review A
Published
2025-08-01
ISSN
2161-623X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3107518930
Cited by
655
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: US-China Education Review A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17265/2161-623x
The paper
US-China Education Review A. (2025). US-China Education Review A. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.