The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a number of tests that measure cross-cultural competence; yet to date there is no review of their validity and reliability. This article addresses this gap in the literature. We discuss issues associated with evaluation of the content, construct, and ecological validity of such tests, and review the evidence for 10 tests. We evaluate that evidence, draw conclusions about the tests with the best evidence for ecological validity, and provide recommendations for future research in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
Snyder, M. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037039 · Cited by 3,402
Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory.
LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.395 · Cited by 2,298
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x · Cited by 2,216
Progress of Veterinary Science.
Jackson, D. N. (1882) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,971
Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/s0147-1767(03)00032-4 · Cited by 1,732
Cultural intelligence: individual interactions across cultures
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4760 · Cited by 1,706
Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804766005 · Cited by 1,706
Black, J. S., & Stephens, G. K. (1989) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638901500403 · Cited by 1,115
Cited by
Leung, K., Ang, S., & Tan, M. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229 · Cited by 450
Haelewaters, D., Hofmann, T. A., & Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 849-873
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2136891610
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 46.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022113492891
- The paper
- Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. (2013). Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113492891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.